226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9879219)
1. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images.
Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors for a false positive test outcome in diagnosis of caries in approximal surfaces: impact of radiographic modality and observer characteristics.
Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Gotfredsen E
Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 17426395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.
Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. RVG-S, VIXA, and Ektaspeed film in detection of proximal enamel defects under orthodontic bands.
Reichl P; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8678348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of direct digital and conventional imaging with Ekta Speed Plus and INSIGHT films for the detection of approximal caries.
de Araujo EA; Castilho JC; Medici Filho E; de Moraes ME
Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 16296430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. TACT imaging of primary caries.
Tyndall DA; Clifton TL; Webber RL; Ludlow JB; Horton RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 9269025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
