These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9879219)

  • 41. Detection of cavitated or non-cavitated approximal enamel caries lesions using CMOS and CCD digital X-ray sensors and conventional D and F-speed films at different exposure conditions.
    Bottenberg P; Jacquet W; Stachniss V; Wellnitz J; Schulte AG
    Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 21698985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Observer differentiation of mechanical defects versus natural dental caries cavitations on monitor-displayed images with imaging plate readout.
    Kang BC; Goldsmith LJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Nov; 86(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 9830655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
    Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Geraets WG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10202472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
    Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of ambient light level at the monitor surface on digital radiographic evaluation of approximal carious lesions: an in vitro study.
    Hellén-Halme K; Lith A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Mar; 41(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 22378753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of ambient light and monitor brightness and contrast settings on the detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs: an in vitro study.
    Hellén-Halme K; Petersson A; Warfvinge G; Nilsson M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Oct; 37(7):380-4. PubMed ID: 18812599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions.
    Wallace JA; Nair MK; Colaco MF; Kapa SF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jul; 92(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 11458252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study.
    Wenzel A; Borg E; Hintze H; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 9161170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Receiver operating characteristics of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Dagenais ME; Clark BG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Feb; 79(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 7614189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
    Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries.
    Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Detection of caries with conventional digital imaging and tuned aperture computed tomography using CRT monitor and laptop displays.
    Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Aug; 88(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 10468469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Extraoral radiographic imaging of primary caries.
    Clifton TL; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 9780894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The influence of image quality on radiographic diagnosis of approximal caries.
    Svenson B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 74():1-62. PubMed ID: 2035145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A sensitometric comparison of four dental X-ray films and their diagnostic accuracy.
    Svenson B; Welander U; Shi XQ; Stamatakis H; Tronje G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9442614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Influence of the number of basis images and projection array on caries detection using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Nortjé CJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 11803385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of varying displays and room illuminance on caries diagnostic accuracy in digital dental radiographs.
    Pakkala T; Kuusela L; Ekholm M; Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Kortesniemi M
    Caries Res; 2012; 46(6):568-74. PubMed ID: 22947623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The detection accuracies for proximal caries by cone-beam computerized tomography, film, and phosphor plates.
    Zhang ZL; Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jan; 111(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 20952219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.