175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9879306)
1. The impact of financial incentives on quality of health care.
Dudley RA; Miller RH; Korenbrot TY; Luft HS
Milbank Q; 1998; 76(4):649-86, 511. PubMed ID: 9879306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The measure of Medicare services.
Appleby C
Hosp Health Netw; 1995 Jun; 69(12):26-8, 30, 32-4. PubMed ID: 7780455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. HMO performance: the debate goes on.
Sullivan K
Health Aff (Millwood); 2002; 21(5):303-4; author reply 304-5. PubMed ID: 12224902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of health insurance plan type on satisfaction with health care.
Dellana SA; Glascoff DW
Health Care Manage Rev; 2001; 26(2):33-46. PubMed ID: 11293009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aligning incentives using risk-sharing arrangements.
Lefton R
Healthc Financ Manage; 1997 Feb; 51(2):50-2, 54-7. PubMed ID: 10164877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health care utilization by the elderly in HMOs: comparing risk and cost contracts.
Siddharthan K; Reid WM
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 1998; 11(2-3):45-9. PubMed ID: 10185315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should we stop making a fuss over HMOs?
Pretzer M
Med Econ; 2000 May; 77(10):41, 45. PubMed ID: 11010248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Paying for quality not quantity: a wisconsin health maintenance organization proposes an incentive model for reimbursement of chiropractic services.
Pursel KJ; Jacobson M; Stephenson K
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012 Jul; 35(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 22926019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does managed care lead to better or worse quality of care?
Miller RH; Luft HS
Health Aff (Millwood); 1997; 16(5):7-25. PubMed ID: 9314673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Linking compensation to quality--Medicare payments to physicians.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 2005 Sep; 353(9):870-2. PubMed ID: 16135830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. By the numbers. Consumer satisfaction with health plans.
Stanton M
Healthplan; 1997; 38(5):67-8. PubMed ID: 10182884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Structural incentives and adoption of medical technologies in HMO and fee-for-service health insurance plans.
Ramsey SD; Pauly MV
Inquiry; 1997; 34(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 9349247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outpatient encounter data for risk adjustment: strategic issues for Medicare and Medicaid.
Welch WP
J Ambul Care Manage; 2002 Jul; 25(3):1-15. PubMed ID: 12141013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The shifting mission of health care delivery organizations.
Bohmer RM; Lee TH
N Engl J Med; 2009 Aug; 361(6):551-3. PubMed ID: 19657119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient satisfaction. They're happier with indemnity care? Says who?
Rose JR
Med Econ; 1998 Sep; 75(18):32. PubMed ID: 10185528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of care by insurance plan. A fee-for-service versus health maintenance organization comparison.
Silcox PD
Outcomes Manag; 2003; 7(4):170-3. PubMed ID: 14618775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of life and patient satisfaction: ESRD managed care demonstration.
Pifer TB; Bragg-Gresham JL; Dykstra DM; Shapiro JR; Oppenheimer CC; Gaylin DS; Beronja N; Rubin RJ; Held PJ
Health Care Financ Rev; 2003; 24(4):45-58. PubMed ID: 14628399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disability outcomes of older Medicare HMO enrollees and fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries.
Porell FW; Miltiades HB
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2001 May; 49(5):615-31. PubMed ID: 11380756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-minimizing risk adjustment.
Shen Y; Ellis RP
J Health Econ; 2002 May; 21(3):515-30. PubMed ID: 12022271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the quality of health care. Observations from the field.
Mattingly PH
Milbank Q; 1998; 76(4):733-5. PubMed ID: 9879309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
