These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9879826)

  • 21. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A methodology for assessing carcinogenic hazards of chemicals.
    Brown HS; Bishop DR; West CR
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1986 Sep; 2(3):205-18. PubMed ID: 3787657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. New aspects in the classification of carcinogens.
    Foth H; Degen GH; Bolt HM
    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2005 Jun; 56(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 15968833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Classification of skin sensitizing substances: a comparison between approaches used by the DFG-MAK Commission and the European Union legislation.
    Lessmann H; Uter W; Diepgen TL; Drexler H; Fartasch M; Greim H; Hartwig A; Kreis P; Löser E; Merget R; Merk H; Nowak D; Rothe A; Stropp G; Schnuch A
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Oct; 61(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 21798301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Chemicals classified by IARC: an investigation of some of their toxicological characteristics.
    McGregor DB
    Toxicol Lett; 1992 Dec; 64-65 Spec No():637-42. PubMed ID: 1471218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maximum workplace concentration values and carcinogenicity classification for mixtures.
    Bartsch R; Forderkunz S; Reuter U; Sterzl-Eckert H; Greim H
    Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Dec; 106 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):1291-3. PubMed ID: 9860883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
    Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Human carcinogenic risk evaluation, part II: contributions of the EUROTOX specialty section for carcinogenesis.
    Bolt HM; Degen GH
    Toxicol Sci; 2004 Sep; 81(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 15159528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ranking of chemicals for carcinogenic potency--a comparative study of 13 carcinogenic chemicals and an examination of some of the issues involved.
    Woodward KN; McDonald A; Joshi S
    Carcinogenesis; 1991 Jun; 12(6):1061-6. PubMed ID: 2044185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Occupation and cancer - follow-up of 15 million people in five Nordic countries.
    Pukkala E; Martinsen JI; Lynge E; Gunnarsdottir HK; Sparén P; Tryggvadottir L; Weiderpass E; Kjaerheim K
    Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(5):646-790. PubMed ID: 19925375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Guidance for the classification of carcinogens under the Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS).
    McGregor D; Boobis A; Binaglia M; Botham P; Hoffstadt L; Hubbard S; Petry T; Riley A; Schwartz D; Hennes C
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Mar; 40(3):245-85. PubMed ID: 20014893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do regulations protect workers from occupational exposures to carcinogenic, mutagenic and reprotoxic (CMR) agents in France?
    Havet N; Penot A; Plantier M; Charbotel B; Morelle M; Fervers B
    Occup Environ Med; 2018 May; 75(5):389-397. PubMed ID: 29223968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the utility of the lifetime mouse bioassay in the identification of cancer hazards for humans.
    Osimitz TG; Droege W; Boobis AR; Lake BG
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2013 Oct; 60():550-62. PubMed ID: 23954551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Recent progress in the evaluation of the dangers of chemical carcinogens].
    Truhaut R
    J Pharm Belg; 1990; 45(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 2192021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A scheme for classifying carcinogens.
    Ashby J; Doerrer NG; Flamm FG; Harris JE; Hughes DH; Johannsen FR; Lewis SC; Krivanek ND; McCarthy JF; Moolenaar RJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1990 Dec; 12(3 Pt 1):270-95. PubMed ID: 2077563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biological tolerance values: change in a paradigm concept from assessment of a single value to use of an average.
    Drexler H; Göen T; Schaller KH
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2008 Oct; 82(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 18560876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Value-of-information analysis of testing strategies: estimating the effect of uncertainty about the proportion of chemicals that are true human carcinogens.
    Ennever FK; Rosenkranz HS; Lave LB; Omenn GS
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340D():295-304. PubMed ID: 2115175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Chemicals classified by IARC: their potency in tests for carcinogenicity in rodents and their genotoxicity and acute toxicity.
    McGregor DB
    IARC Sci Publ; 1992; (116):323-52. PubMed ID: 1428089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Strategies for evaluating carcinogenic substances].
    Henschler D
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1995 Apr; 197(1-3):180-7. PubMed ID: 8579707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Night shift work characteristics and occupational co-exposures in industrial plants in Łódź, Poland.
    Pepłońska B; Burdelak W; Bukowska A; Krysicka J; Konieczko K
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2013 Aug; 26(4):522-34. PubMed ID: 24037502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.