193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9879916)
1. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing.
Dietschi D; Herzfeld D
Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Dec; 106(6):1033-42. PubMed ID: 9879916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test.
Dietschi D; Moor L
J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 11725685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement.
Dietschi D; Monasevic M; Krejci I; Davidson C
J Dent; 2002; 30(5-6):259-69. PubMed ID: 12450717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments. "Post-fatigue adaptation of indirect composite restorations".
Rocca GT; Gregor L; Sandoval MJ; Krejci I; Dietschi D
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Oct; 16(5):1385-93. PubMed ID: 22065245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
Krejci I; Lutz F
J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of multi-step dentin bonding systems and resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner on marginal quality of dentin-bonded resin composite Class II restorations.
Haller B; Trojanski A
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Sep; 2(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 9927914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations.
Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
Dent Mater; 1995 May; 11(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 8600007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The marginal quality of luted ceramic inserts in bovine teeth and ceramic inlays in extracted molars after occlusal loading.
Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Rousson V
J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 16240962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
Spahr A; Schön F; Haller B
Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of eugenol-containing sealer on marginal adaptation of dentine-bonded resin fillings.
Peters O; Göhring TN; Lutz F
Int Endod J; 2000 Jan; 33(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 11307474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases.
Dietschi D; Olsburgh S; Krejci I; Davidson C
Eur J Oral Sci; 2003 Feb; 111(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 12558811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of resin composite inlays in vitro.
Roggendorf MJ; Krämer N; Dippold C; Vosen VE; Naumann M; Jablonski-Momeni A; Frankenberger R
J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1068-73. PubMed ID: 22960537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro analysis of the effects of acid or laser etching on microleakage around composite resin restorations.
Yazici AR; Frentzen M; Dayangac B
J Dent; 2001 Jul; 29(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 11472808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interfacial adaptation of a Class II polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite laminate restoration in vivo.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
Acta Odontol Scand; 2000 Apr; 58(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 10894429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
