These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9880187)
21. Effects of surface roughness of titanium implants on bone remodeling activity of femur in rabbits. Suzuki K; Aoki K; Ohya K Bone; 1997 Dec; 21(6):507-14. PubMed ID: 9430240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Early bone response to sandblasted, dual acid-etched and H2O2/HCl treated titanium implants: an experimental study in the rabbit. He FM; Yang GL; Li YN; Wang XX; Zhao SF Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 38(6):677-81. PubMed ID: 19406618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Electrochemical growth behavior, surface properties, and enhanced in vivo bone response of TiO2 nanotubes on microstructured surfaces of blasted, screw-shaped titanium implants. Sul YT Int J Nanomedicine; 2010 Apr; 5():87-100. PubMed ID: 20463928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation. Yang GL; He FM; Zhao SS; Wang XX; Zhao SF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Removal torque and histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic grit-blasted/acid-etched and dual acid-etched implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs. Marin C; Granato R; Suzuki M; Gil JN; Piattelli A; Coelho PG J Periodontol; 2008 Oct; 79(10):1942-9. PubMed ID: 18834250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Osteoblastic cell behaviour on modified titanium surfaces. Lukaszewska-Kuska M; Wirstlein P; Majchrowski R; Dorocka-Bobkowska B Micron; 2018 Feb; 105():55-63. PubMed ID: 29179009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1- and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium. Att W; Tsukimura N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 17974105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Interfacial shear strength of endosseous implants. Butz F; Ogawa T; Nishimura I Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):746-51. PubMed ID: 21841983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of surface roughness, porosity, and a resorbable calcium phosphate coating on osseointegration of titanium in a minipig model. Schwarz ML; Kowarsch M; Rose S; Becker K; Lenz T; Jani L J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jun; 89(3):667-78. PubMed ID: 18442101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo. Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bone response to endosseous titanium implants surface-modified by blasting and chemical treatment: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur. Park JW; Jang IS; Suh JY J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2008 Feb; 84(2):400-7. PubMed ID: 17595031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Osseointegration of Titanium Implants With Different Rough Surfaces: A Histologic and Histomorphometric Study in an Adult Minipig Model. Fabbro MD; Taschieri S; Canciani E; Addis A; Musto F; Weinstein R; Dellavia C Implant Dent; 2017 Jun; 26(3):357-366. PubMed ID: 28234707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Enhanced implant integration with hierarchically structured implants: a pilot study in rabbits. Johansson CB; Gretzer C; Jimbo R; Mattisson I; Ahlberg E Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Aug; 23(8):943-53. PubMed ID: 21722190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model. Yang GL; He FM; Yang XF; Wang XX; Zhao SF Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):516-24. PubMed ID: 18602288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The removal torque of titanium screw inserted in rabbit tibia treated by dual acid etching. Cho SA; Park KT Biomaterials; 2003 Sep; 24(20):3611-7. PubMed ID: 12809791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Osteoconductive Potential of Mesoporous Titania Implant Surfaces Loaded with Magnesium: An Experimental Study in the Rabbit. Galli S; Naito Y; Karlsson J; He W; Andersson M; Wennerberg A; Jimbo R Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1048-59. PubMed ID: 25178845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of biomaterial surface texture on bone ingrowth in the rabbit femur. Friedman RJ; An YH; Ming J; Draughn RA; Bauer TW J Orthop Res; 1996 May; 14(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 8676259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Implant-delivered Alendronate Causes a Dose-dependent Response on Net Bone Formation Around Porous Titanium Implants in Canines. Pura JA; Bobyn JD; Tanzer M Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 May; 474(5):1224-33. PubMed ID: 26831478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Experimental evidence for interfacial biochemical bonding in osseointegrated titanium implants. Sul YT; Kwon DH; Kang BS; Oh SJ; Johansson C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():8-19. PubMed ID: 22093014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The bone-implant interface: a dynamic surface. Goldberg VM; Jinno T J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1999; 9(1-2):11-21. PubMed ID: 10537583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]