These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9881004)

  • 1. [Standardized ultrasound follow-up of callus distraction of the mandible].
    Jünger TH; Klingmüller V; Howaldt HP
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1998 Nov; 2(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 9881004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Sonography in callus distraction of the hypoplastic mandible].
    Klingmüller V; Jünger TH; Howaldt HP; Rau WS
    Rofo; 2002 Aug; 174(8):979-83. PubMed ID: 12142974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of ultrasound in callus distraction of the hypoplastic mandible: an additional method for the follow-up.
    Juenger TH; Klingmueller V; Howaldt HP
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1999 Jun; 27(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 10442306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Ultrasound of segment distraction and callus formation in reconstruction of the mandible. Value of surgical ultrasound of callus distraction of vascularized ilial crest transplants and mandibular segments in a previously irradiated area].
    Friedrich RE; Hellner D; Plambeck K; Schmelzle R
    Ultraschall Med; 1997 Aug; 18(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 9381127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia].
    Kulewicz M; Cudzilo D; Hortis-Dzierzbicka M; Obloj B; Krol Z
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2004; 8(3 Pt 2):761-72. PubMed ID: 15858248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in craniofacial abnormalities].
    Kessler P; Wiltfang J; Merten HA; Neukam FW
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 May; 4(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 10900962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Analysis of the complications following mandibular distraction using internal distractors].
    Wu GP; Teng L; Gui L; Sun XM; Zhang ZY; Liu JF; Yu B; Xia DL; Luo JC
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 22(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 16573158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distraction osteogenesis in the pediatric population.
    Lin SJ; Roy S; Patel PK
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Aug; 137(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 17666247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five year follow-up of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on the dentofacial structures of syndromic children.
    Gürsoy S; Hukki J; Hurmerinta K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Feb; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18199081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mandible distraction using internal device: mathematical analysis of the results.
    Freitas Rda S; Alonso N; Busato L; D'oro U; Ferreira MC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 18(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 17251832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [CT-assisted volumetry and densitometry of distraction osteogenesis lengthened mandibular areas].
    Klein C; Becker C
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Sep; 4 Suppl 2():S446-53. PubMed ID: 11094514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandibular deformities: single-vector distraction techniques for a multivector problem.
    Singh DJ; Glick PH; Bartlett SP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1468-72. PubMed ID: 19816280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bilateral intra-oral distraction osteogenesis for the management of severe congenital mandibular hypoplasia in early childhood.
    Sadakah AA; Elshall MA; Farhat AA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 37(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 19081264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seven years clinical experience with mandibular distraction in children.
    Carls FR; Sailer HF
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1998 Aug; 26(4):197-208. PubMed ID: 9777498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Mandibular hypoplasia. Growth induction by osteochondral transplants or callus distraction?].
    Appel T; Bergé S; Niederhagen B; Reich RH; Berten J
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Sep; 4 Suppl 2():S428-31. PubMed ID: 11094510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis: special attention to treatment planning.
    Rubio-Bueno P; Villa E; Carreño A; Naval L; Sastre J; Manzanares R; Díaz-González FJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 29(5):254-62. PubMed ID: 11673919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: evaluation of callus distraction by B-scan ultrasonography.
    Nocini PF; Albanese M; Wangerin K; Fior A; Trevisiol L; Kretschmer W
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2002 Oct; 30(5):286-91. PubMed ID: 12377201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A preliminary report of a case using an intra-oral distraction device.
    McGurk M; Slabberti HD; Amis A; McDonald F
    Br Dent J; 1997 Jul; 183(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 18069180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcome of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis with bone-borne devices.
    Raoul G; Wojcik T; Ferri J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):488-93. PubMed ID: 19276820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the treatment for micromandibular deformity by distraction osteogenesis with submerged intraoral device.
    Gao YM; Qiu WL; Tang YS; Shen GF
    Chin J Dent Res; 1999 Dec; 2(3-4):31-7. PubMed ID: 10863414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.