These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9881258)

  • 1. Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes: value of B-mode and color Doppler sonography.
    Adibelli ZH; Unal G; Gül E; Uslu F; Koçak U; Abali Y
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Oct; 28(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 9881258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis.
    Choi MY; Lee JW; Jang KJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):981-4. PubMed ID: 7677005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes with color Doppler sonography.
    Chang DB; Yuan A; Yu CJ; Luh KT; Kuo SH; Yang PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8141027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Differential Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Nodes: A Comparative Study With B-mode and Color Doppler Sonography.
    Acu L; Oktar SÖ; Acu R; Yücel C; Cebeci S
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Nov; 35(11):2491-2499. PubMed ID: 27794132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patients with breast cancer: differences in color Doppler flow and gray-scale US features of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes.
    Yang WT; Chang J; Metreweli C
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):568-73. PubMed ID: 10796941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Differential diagnosis in cervical lymphadenopathies: efficacy of B-mode, color and power Doppler ultrasonography].
    Ayata Z; Apaydin M; Varer M; Sarsilmaz A; Calli C; Rezanko T
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2009; 19(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 19860630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vascularization of reactively enlarged lymph nodes analyzed by color duplex sonography.
    Schroeder RJ; Maeurer J; Gath HJ; Willam C; Hidajat N
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Sep; 57(9):1090-5. PubMed ID: 10484110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: usefulness of color Doppler sonography.
    Na DG; Lim HK; Byun HS; Kim HD; Ko YH; Baek JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1311-6. PubMed ID: 9129432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Differentiation of abdominal lymphadenoptahy with power Doppler sonography].
    Neumann-Silkow H; Görg C
    Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 20084598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does ultrasound contrast agent improve the diagnostic value of colour and power Doppler sonography in superficial lymph node enlargement?
    Schulte-Altedorneburg G; Demharter J; Linné R; Droste DW; Bohndorf K; Bücklein W
    Eur J Radiol; 2003 Dec; 48(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 14652142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lymphadenopathy: differentiation of benign from malignant disease--color Doppler US assessment of intranodal angioarchitecture.
    Tschammler A; Ott G; Schang T; Seelbach-Goebel B; Schwager K; Hahn D
    Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 9646801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck].
    Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J
    Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distribution of intranodal vessels in differentiating benign from metastatic neck nodes.
    Ahuja AT; Ying M; Ho SS; Metreweli C
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Mar; 56(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 11247696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Signal-enhanced color-coded duplex sonography of reactively and metastatically enlarged lymph nodes].
    Schröder RJ; Mäurer J; Hidajat N; Willam C; Hell B; Weber S; Vogl T; Felix R
    Rofo; 1998 Jan; 168(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 9501935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ultrasound evaluation of characteristics of cervical lymph nodes with special reference to color Doppler ultrasound. A contribution to differentiating reactive from metastatic lymph node involvement in the neck].
    Issing PR; Kettling T; Kempf HG; Heermann R; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Oct; 78(10):566-72. PubMed ID: 10595342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Color Doppler ultrasound studies of benign and malignant lymph nodes].
    Benzel W; Zenk J; Winter M; Iro H
    HNO; 1996 Dec; 44(12):666-71. PubMed ID: 9081950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Dangore SB; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 18460573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utility of color Doppler ultrasound in evaluating the status of cervical lymph nodes in oral cancer.
    Dangore-Khasbage S; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR; Banode PJ; Bhake A; Choudhary MS; Lohe VK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 19272807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential diagnosis of lymphadenopathy: power Doppler vs color Doppler sonography.
    Tschammler A; Beer M; Hahn D
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Jul; 12(7):1794-9. PubMed ID: 12111071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sonographic assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: role of high-resolution and color Doppler imaging.
    Gupta A; Rahman K; Shahid M; Kumar A; Qaseem SM; Hassan SA; Siddiqui FA
    Head Neck; 2011 Mar; 33(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20652889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.