These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 988126)

  • 21. [Brain stem response audiometry in infants (author's transl)].
    Kodera K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1981 Feb; 84(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 7277080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Studies on the objective audiometry for deafness: Especially intratympanic muscle relfex by using the impedance method (author's transl)].
    Nadoyama Y
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1976 Aug; 79(8):909-22. PubMed ID: 988151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Measurements of hearing sensations in ultrasound range by electrical response audiometry (ERA) (author's transl)].
    Flach M; Hofmann G; Ertel H; Knothe J
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Jul; 57(7):680-6. PubMed ID: 682786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Impedance audiometry its clinical application and diagnostic standard (author's transl)].
    Ichimura K; Kodera K; Funasaka S
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1976 May; 79(5):555-67. PubMed ID: 988139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The Göttingen audiometric speech test for children. I. Speech audiometry of the young and retarded child by a picture-test (author's transl)].
    Chilla R; Gabriel P; Kozielski P; Bänsch D; Kabas M
    HNO; 1976 Oct; 24(10):342-6. PubMed ID: 993079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Basis and clinical application of the "contingent negative variation" in "evoked response audiometry" (author's transl)].
    Brix R
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1975 Jan; 87(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 1130075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Latencies of reaction indicating disturbed behaviour during evaluation of pure tone threshold (author's transl)].
    Kumpf W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 May; 60(5):259-63. PubMed ID: 7231014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Application of medical electronics to otology: electric response audiometry, impedance audiometry and quantitative diagnosis with microcomputers (author's transl)].
    Funasaka S
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1979 Sep; 17(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 533924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Automatic evaluation of ERA based on stochastic-ergodic conversion (SEC) (author's transl)].
    Leitner H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1975 Aug; 54(8):677-88. PubMed ID: 129639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The Göttingen audiometric speech test for children. II. Speech audiometry of the pre-school child with a monosyllabic picture-test (author's transl)].
    Gabriel P; Chilla R; Kiese C; Kabas M; Bänsch D
    HNO; 1976 Nov; 24(11):399-402. PubMed ID: 993084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [High tone audiometry. II. Clinical application (author's transl)].
    Böhme G
    HNO; 1978 Sep; 26(9):315-9. PubMed ID: 701107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Diagnosis of hearing disorders by very early AER (author's transl)].
    Gerull G; Giesen M; Mrowinski D; Rudolph N
    HNO; 1974 Jul; 22(7):220-5. PubMed ID: 4409191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [A comparison of impedance and pure tone audiometry in children (author's transl)].
    Thom HP
    HNO; 1979 Jun; 27(6):207-10. PubMed ID: 457466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Interest of auditory brainstem responses in clinical diagnosis (author's transl)].
    Despland PA; Regli F
    Acta Neurol Belg; 1979; 79(6):483-94. PubMed ID: 554418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Brain stem evoked response audiometry via air- and bone-conducted stimulation (author's transl)].
    Hofmann G; Flach M
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 May; 60(5):264-7. PubMed ID: 7231015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The reaction time as a source of error in threshold audiometry (author's transl)].
    Kiessling J
    HNO; 1977 Oct; 25(10):353-7. PubMed ID: 914662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [New methods in the objective audiometry for the proof of simulation and for the determination of the differential thresholds for frequency and intensity (author's transl)].
    Brix R
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Aug; 57(8):733-9. PubMed ID: 682792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Dichotic hearing test in 750 German school-children (author's transl)].
    Chüden HG; Göpfert M
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1975 Sep; 54(9):747-55. PubMed ID: 129651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Electrocochleography or evoked cortical responses: which is preferable in diagnosis of hearing loss.
    Sohmer H; Pratt H; Feinmesser M
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1974; 95(7-8):515-22. PubMed ID: 4460144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Damages of the auditory pathway at brain stem level investigated by acoustically evoked potentials (author's transl)].
    Gerull G; Giesen M; Mrowinski D; Knüpling R
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Jan; 56(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 138056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.