These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9881609)

  • 1. An evaluation of the use made of cosmetic and functional prostheses by unilateral upper limb amputees.
    Fraser CM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1998 Dec; 22(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 9881609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses.
    Millstein SG; Heger H; Hunter GA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Apr; 10(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 3725563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analyzing at-home prosthesis use in unilateral upper-limb amputees to inform treatment & device design.
    Spiers AJ; Resnik L; Dollar AM
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1273-1280. PubMed ID: 28813996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees.
    Kejlaa GH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 8134275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.
    Stein RB; Walley M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A field evaluation of arm prostheses for unilateral amputees.
    van Lunteren A; van Lunteren-Gerritsen GH; Stassen HG; Zuithoff MJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1983 Dec; 7(3):141-51. PubMed ID: 6647010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prosthesis use in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees: patterns of wear, prosthetic skills and the actual use of prostheses in activities of daily life.
    Østlie K; Lesjø IM; Franklin RJ; Garfelt B; Skjeldal OH; Magnus P
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Nov; 7(6):479-93. PubMed ID: 22315926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Function and Quality of Life of Unilateral Major Upper Limb Amputees: Effect of Prosthesis Use and Type.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Clark M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 101(8):1396-1406. PubMed ID: 32437692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing physical function in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees by combining the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Questionnaire and clinical examination.
    Ostlie K; Franklin RJ; Skjeldal OH; Skrondal A; Magnus P
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 92(10):1636-45. PubMed ID: 21872841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Body schema and body awareness of amputees.
    Mayer A; Kudar K; Bretz K; Tihanyi J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Sep; 32(3):363-82. PubMed ID: 18677671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K; Fantini C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 23902465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees.
    Dudkiewicz I; Gabrielov R; Seiv-Ner I; Zelig G; Heim M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Jan; 26(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 14660200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective benefits of energy storing prostheses.
    Alaranta H; Lempinen VM; Haavisto E; Pohjolainen T; Hurri H
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1994 Aug; 18(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 7991366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency--acquired and congenital.
    Datta D; Selvarajah K; Davey N
    Clin Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 18(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15053126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Silicone roll-on suspension for upper limb prostheses: users' views.
    Gaber TA; Gardner CM; Kirker SG
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2001 Aug; 25(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 11573878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostheses and the forward reach of sitting lower-limb amputees.
    Kirby RL; Chari VR
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Feb; 71(2):125-7. PubMed ID: 2302045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey.
    Østlie K; Lesjø IM; Franklin RJ; Garfelt B; Skjeldal OH; Magnus P
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Jul; 7(4):294-303. PubMed ID: 22112174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expert opinions on success factors for upper-limb prostheses.
    Schultz AE; Baade SP; Kuiken TA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2007; 44(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 18247245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of polypropylene prostheses designed by the International Committee of the Red Cross for trans-tibial amputees.
    Jensen JS; Heim S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2000 Apr; 24(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 10855438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical application study of externally powered upper-limb prosthetics systems: the VA elbow, the VA hand, and the VA/NU myoelectric hand systems.
    Lewis EA; Sheredos CR; Sowell TT; Houston VL
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1975; (10-24):51-136. PubMed ID: 776301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.