These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. How to choose and critically evaluate an article in evidence-based urology. Moinzadeh A Can J Urol; 2008 Aug; 15(4):4143-6. PubMed ID: 18706139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The unifying dilemma of the Pakistani science journals. Sohail S J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 May; 18(5):263-4. PubMed ID: 18541077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Journal adopts use of conventional and Si units. Stein K J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Aug; 105(8):1186-7. PubMed ID: 16182628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New requirements for manuscript submission to Urology. Klein EA Urology; 2011 Apr; 77(4):771. PubMed ID: 21477707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Analysis on acupuncture literature in Science Citation Index (SCI) periodicals in 2007]. Gao L; Tian LX; Guo Y Zhongguo Zhen Jiu; 2009 Jun; 29(6):504-7. PubMed ID: 19563203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Delayed impact: ISI's citation tracking choices are keeping scientists in the dark. Cockerill MJ BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Jul; 5():93. PubMed ID: 15248902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evidence-based defense of case reports in urology]. Fariña-Pérez LA Actas Urol Esp; 2011; 35(10):620. PubMed ID: 21824687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Human reference sequence makes sense of names. Crawford DL Nature; 2007 May; 447(7141):142. PubMed ID: 17495903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Nature Clinical Practice Urology: one year on. Hay AM; Scardino PT Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2005 Nov; 2(11):517. PubMed ID: 16474578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Re: A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature. C. D. Scales, Jr., R. D. Norris, s. A. Keitz, B. L. Peterson, G. M. Preminger, J. Vieweg and P. Dahm. J Urol 2007; 177: 1090-1095. Mesrobian HG J Urol; 2008 Jun; 179(6):2488-9; author reply 2489. PubMed ID: 18439625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Inadequate statistical power of negative clinical trials in urological literature. Breau RH; Carnat TA; Gaboury I J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):263-6. PubMed ID: 16753417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy of references of three allergy journals. Siebers R J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2000 Apr; 105(4):837-8. PubMed ID: 10756238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How the new BJU International website benefits prospective authors. Drake M; Webber R; Gardiner F; Fitzpatrick JM BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):i-ii. PubMed ID: 18184324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. This is the reason why we are exploring the possibility of rewarding courageous contributors and reviewers by giving them CME points for their hard work. Frank JD; Caldamone A; Woodward M; Mouriquand P J Pediatr Urol; 2009 Feb; 5(1):1. PubMed ID: 19117805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A new Editorial Team for the BJU International…. Hamdy FC BJU Int; 2020 Aug; 126(2):213-214. PubMed ID: 32776451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]