These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9883472)
21. [Abortion--a taboo right. Women's complex experiences include both relief and pain]. Kero A Lakartidningen; 2005 Nov 28-Dec 4; 102(48):3677-80. PubMed ID: 16416948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reflections on the legalisation of abortion in Portugal. Oliveira da Silva M Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2009 Aug; 14(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 19526419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Abortion in democratic Spain: the parliamentary political agenda 1979-2004. Cambronero-Saiz B; Ruiz Cantero MT; Vives-Cases C; Carrasco Portiño M Reprod Health Matters; 2007 May; 15(29):85-96. PubMed ID: 17512380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Roe v. Wade. My prochoice journey. Kennedy KR Conscience; 1998; 18(4):28. PubMed ID: 12178916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The abortion polemic: a restatement of pros and cons. Pérez de Agulló M Rev Jurid Univ P R; 1973; 42(2):247-76. PubMed ID: 11663393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [The ideology of the common good and legislative issues concerning abortion]. Marques Pereira B Rev Inst Sociol; 1984; (1-2):239-56. PubMed ID: 12313959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Abortion in a just society. Hunt ME Conscience; 1993; 14(1-2):33-6. PubMed ID: 12178856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The "gag rule" revisited: physicians as abortion gatekeepers. Bloche MG Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 11651561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.". Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Two steps back: Poland's new abortion law. Nowicka W Plan Parent Eur; 1993 Jun; 22(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 12287103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The uneasy case for a national law on abortion. Correia EO Am Prospect; 1991; (5):84-90. PubMed ID: 12285375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Inverting the viability test for abortion law. Ching B Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A right to life for the unborn? The current debate on abortion in Germany and Norbert Hoerster's legal-philosophical justification for the right to life. Simon A J Med Philos; 2000 Apr; 25(2):220-39. PubMed ID: 10833137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. US defeated on antiabortion statements at UN women's meeting. Tanne JH BMJ; 2005 Mar; 330(7492):621. PubMed ID: 15774986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Reproductive rights on firmer ground with prochoice White House, Congress. Special report -- abortion and the 1992 elections. Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Nov; (18):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Our bodies, our souls: rethinking pro-choice rhetoric. Wolf N New Repub; 1995 Oct; 213(16):26, 28-29, 32-35. PubMed ID: 11656511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [On research concerning abortion in Latin America and studies on women]. Barroso C Rev Bras Estud Popul; 1989; 6(1):35-60. PubMed ID: 12316176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Abortion and moral consensus: beyond Solomon's choice. Kolbenschlag M Christ Century; 1985 Feb; 102(6):179-83. PubMed ID: 11653713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]