These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9883551)

  • 1. A comparison of conditional and unconditional randomization tests for highly stratified designs.
    Flyer PA
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1551-9. PubMed ID: 9883551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.
    Schouten HJ
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1529-35. PubMed ID: 8589238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response adaptive designs with a variance-penalized criterion.
    Yi Y; Wang X
    Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):763-73. PubMed ID: 19757432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method to estimate the variance of an endpoint from an on-going blinded trial.
    Xing B; Ganju J
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1807-14. PubMed ID: 15803440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stratified and randomized play-the-winner rule.
    Liang Y; Carriere KC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):581-93. PubMed ID: 18375460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The analysis of continuous outcomes in multi-centre trials with small centre sizes.
    Pickering RM; Weatherall M
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5445-56. PubMed ID: 17924360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequential monitoring of randomization tests: stratified randomization.
    Zhang Y; Rosenberger WF; Smythe RT
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):865-72. PubMed ID: 17825016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporating cost in power analysis for three-level cluster-randomized designs.
    Konstantopoulos S
    Eval Rev; 2009 Aug; 33(4):335-57. PubMed ID: 19509118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blinded assessment of treatment effects utilizing information about the randomization block length.
    Miller F; Friede T; Kieser M
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(12):1690-706. PubMed ID: 19340815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomizing research participants: promoting balance and concealment in small samples.
    Matthews EE; Cook PF; Terada M; Aloia MS
    Res Nurs Health; 2010 Jun; 33(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 20499394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cox regression methods for two-stage randomization designs.
    Lokhnygina Y; Helterbrand JD
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):422-8. PubMed ID: 17425633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.
    Lewsey JD
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 15027079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal conditional error functions for the control of conditional power.
    Brannath W; Bauer P
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 15339294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size determination for hierarchical longitudinal designs with differential attrition rates.
    Roy A; Bhaumik DK; Aryal S; Gibbons RD
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):699-707. PubMed ID: 17825003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A SAS macro for constrained randomization of group-randomized designs.
    Chaudhary MA; Moulton LH
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Sep; 83(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 16870302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re-estimating the sample size of an on-going blinded trial based on the method of randomization block sums.
    Ganju J; Xing B
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 18837073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A SAS macro for sample size adjustment and randomization test for internal pilot study.
    Wang S; Xia J; Yu L; Li C; Xu L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Apr; 90(1):66-88. PubMed ID: 18192069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Large sample tests for binary outcomes in fixed-dose combination drug studies.
    Wang SJ; Hung HM
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):498-503. PubMed ID: 9192448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brick tunnel randomization for unequal allocation to two or more treatment groups.
    Kuznetsova OM; Tymofyeyev Y
    Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(8):812-24. PubMed ID: 21432876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extension of the rank sum test for clustered data: two-group comparisons with group membership defined at the subunit level.
    Rosner B; Glynn RJ; Lee ML
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1251-9. PubMed ID: 17156300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.