785 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9883920)
1. A comparison of medical and surgical termination of pregnancy: choice, emotional impact and satisfaction with care.
Slade P; Heke S; Fletcher J; Stewart P
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Dec; 105(12):1288-95. PubMed ID: 9883920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical abortion or vacuum aspiration? Two year follow up of a patient preference trial.
Howie FL; Henshaw RC; Naji SA; Russell IT; Templeton AA
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jul; 104(7):829-33. PubMed ID: 9236649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women's preferences and acceptability of treatment.
Henshaw RC; Naji SA; Russell IT; Templeton AA
BMJ; 1993 Sep; 307(6906):714-7. PubMed ID: 8401094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychological responses following medical abortion (using mifepristone and gemeprost) and surgical vacuum aspiration. A patient-centered, partially randomised prospective study.
Henshaw R; Naji S; Russell I; Templeton A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Nov; 73(10):812-8. PubMed ID: 7817735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychological distress symptoms in women undergoing medical vs. surgical termination of pregnancy.
Lowenstein L; Deutcsh M; Gruberg R; Solt I; Yagil Y; Nevo O; Bloch M
Gen Hosp Psychiatry; 2006; 28(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 16377364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Women's evaluation of three early abortion methods.
Holmgren K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1992 Dec; 71(8):616-23. PubMed ID: 1336921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks' gestation (TOPS).
Robson SC; Kelly T; Howel D; Deverill M; Hewison J; Lie ML; Stamp E; Armstrong N; May CR
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Nov; 13(53):1-124, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 19906334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anxieties and attitudes towards abortion in women presenting for medical and surgical abortions.
Wiebe ER; Trouton KJ; Fielding SL; Grant H; Henderson A
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2004 Oct; 26(10):881-5. PubMed ID: 15507198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the introduction of new medical methods on therapeutic abortions at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.
Cameron ST; Glasier AF; Logan J; Benton L; Baird DT
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Dec; 103(12):1222-9. PubMed ID: 8968240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's satisfaction with medical termination.
Maaita ME; Prasarman C; Smith J; Neale EJ
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Apr; 25(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 10228242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meeting women's need for a flexible abortion service: retrospective study of a specialist day-care unit.
Lowy A; Ojo R; Stegeman A; Vellacott I
J Public Health Med; 1998 Dec; 20(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 9923953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of termination of pregnancy procedures: Patient choice, emotional impact and satisfaction with care.
Heath J; Mitchell N; Fletcher J
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2019 Mar; 19():42-49. PubMed ID: 30928134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Counselling before first trimester abortion and acceptability of the procedure: results from a Slovenian cross-sectional study.
Vodopivec S; Bokal EV; Pinter B
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2019 Dec; 24(6):487-493. PubMed ID: 31584298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Acceptability of medical abortion with methotrexate and misoprostol.
Creinin MD; Park M
Contraception; 1995 Jul; 52(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 8521713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Doulas for surgical management of miscarriage and abortion: a randomized controlled trial.
Wilson SF; Gurney EP; Sammel MD; Schreiber CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):44.e1-44.e6. PubMed ID: 27612588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methotrexate and misoprostol for early abortion: a multicenter trial. Acceptability.
Creinin MD; Burke AE
Contraception; 1996 Jul; 54(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8804803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychological outcomes of medical versus surgical elective first trimester abortion.
Crandell L
Nurs Womens Health; 2012; 16(4):296-307. PubMed ID: 22900806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of medical abortion (using mifepristone and gemeprost) with surgical vacuum aspiration: efficacy and early medical sequelae.
Henshaw RC; Naji SA; Russell IT; Templeton AA
Hum Reprod; 1994 Nov; 9(11):2167-72. PubMed ID: 7868693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mobile phone messages to provide support to women during the home phase of medical abortion in South Africa: a randomised controlled trial.
Constant D; de Tolly K; Harries J; Myer L
Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 24850188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experience and acceptability of medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol among U.S. women.
Beckman LJ; Harvey SM
Womens Health Issues; 1997; 7(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 9283280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
