These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9883943)

  • 1. A generic mixing system for achieving conditions suitable for single point representative effluent air sampling.
    McFarland AR; Anand NK; Ortiz CA; Gupta R; Chandra S; McManigle AP
    Health Phys; 1999 Jan; 76(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 9883943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A generic-tee-plenum mixing system for application to single point aerosol sampling in stacks and ducts.
    Han T; O'Neal DL; Ortiz CA
    Health Phys; 2007 Jan; 92(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 17164598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suitability of air sampling locations downstream of bends and static mixing elements.
    McFarland AR; Gupta R; Anand NK
    Health Phys; 1999 Dec; 77(6):703-12. PubMed ID: 10568550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mixing in a square and a rectangular duct regarding selection of locations for extractive sampling of gaseous contaminants.
    Seo Y; McFarland AR; Ortiz CA; O'Neal DL
    Health Phys; 2006 Jul; 91(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 16775480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single point aerosol sampling: evaluation of mixing and probe performance in a nuclear stack.
    Rodgers JC; Fairchild CI; Wood GO; Ortiz CA; Muyshondt A; McFarland AR
    Health Phys; 1996 Jan; 70(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 7499148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of mixing downstream of tees in duct systems with respect to single point representative air sampling.
    Kim T; O'Neal DL; Ortiz C
    Health Phys; 2006 Sep; 91(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 16891896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scaled tests and modeling of effluent stack sampling location mixing.
    Recknagle KP; Yokuda ST; Ballinger MY; Barnett JM
    Health Phys; 2009 Feb; 96(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 19131738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gas mixing for achieving suitable conditions for single point aerosol sampling in a straight tube: experimental and numerical results.
    Anand M; McFarland AR; Rajagopal KR
    Health Phys; 2003 Jan; 84(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 12498520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A constant flow filter air sampler for workplace environments.
    Parulian A; Rodgers JC; McFarland AR
    Health Phys; 1996 Dec; 71(6):870-8. PubMed ID: 8919070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An experimental study of aerosol penetration through horizontal tubes and Strom-type loops.
    Wong FS; McFarland AR; Anand NK
    Health Phys; 1996 Dec; 71(6):886-95. PubMed ID: 8919072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radioactivity in airborne particulates and precipitation. 3. Pan American air sampling program, May 1972.
    Radiat Data Rep; 1972 Sep; 13(9):517. PubMed ID: 5082352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Radioactive and radiation standards. (IX), 7. Standard sources for environmental radioactivity measurement: (2) Unsealed radioactivity calibration samples (author's transl)].
    Bando S
    Radioisotopes; 1979 Nov; 28(11):719-27. PubMed ID: 531256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A European bibliography on airborne gamma-ray spectrometry.
    Sanderson DC; McLeod JJ; Ferguson JM
    J Environ Radioact; 2001; 53(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 11379066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of sampling locations for two radionuclide air-sampling systems based on the requirements of ANSI/HPS N13.1-1999.
    Ballinger MY; Barnett JM; Glissmeyer JA; Edwards DL
    Health Phys; 2004 Apr; 86(4):406-15. PubMed ID: 15057062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of an analytical technique for distributing air sampling locations around nuclear facilities.
    Waite DA
    Health Phys; 1976 Sep; 31(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 977347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose Comparisons for a Site-specific Representative Person Using the Age-dependent Dose Coefficients in CAP88-PC Version 4.
    Stagich BH; Moore KR; Newton JR; Dixon KL; Jannik GT
    Health Phys; 2017 Apr; 112(4):338-342. PubMed ID: 28234692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance evaluation of continuous air monitor (CAM) sampling heads.
    McFarland AR; Ortiz CA; Rodgers JC
    Health Phys; 1990 Mar; 58(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 2312293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of dose results from the Clean Air Act Assessment Package-1988, personal computer (CAP88-PC), version 3 to previous versions.
    Rhoads K; Snyder S; Staven L
    Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S125-39. PubMed ID: 23803666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation data and reports. Air surveillance network, May 1970.
    Radiat Data Rep; 1972 Sep; 13(9):521-4. PubMed ID: 5082355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of four 90Sr groundwater analytical methods.
    Scarpitta S; Odin-McCabe J; Gaschott R; Meier A; Klug E
    Health Phys; 1999 Jun; 76(6):644-56. PubMed ID: 10334581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.