334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9884036)
1. Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair.
Klosterhalfen B; Klinge U; Schumpelick V
Biomaterials; 1998 Dec; 19(24):2235-46. PubMed ID: 9884036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of polyglactin-coating on functional and morphological parameters of polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair.
Klinge U; Klosterhalfen B; Müller M; Anurov M; Ottinger A; Schumpelick V
Biomaterials; 1999 Apr; 20(7):613-23. PubMed ID: 10208403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Morphologic correlation of functional abdominal wall mechanics after mesh implantation].
Klosterhalfen B; Klinge U; Henze U; Bhardwaj R; Conze J; Schumpelick V
Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1997; 382(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 9198710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall.
Klinge U; Klosterhalfen B; Conze J; Limberg W; Obolenski B; Ottinger AP; Schumpelick V
Eur J Surg; 1998 Dec; 164(12):951-60. PubMed ID: 10029391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of Polypropylene versus Parietex composite®, Vicryl® and Ultrapro® meshes, regarding the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions.
Biondo-Simões ML; Carvalho LB; Conceição LT; Santos KB; Schiel WA; Arantes M; Silveira TD; Magri JC; Gomes FF
Acta Cir Bras; 2017 Feb; 32(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 28300876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tissue response to polypropylene meshes used in the repair of abdominal wall defects.
Bellón JM; Contreras LA; Buján J; Palomares D; Carrera-San Martín A
Biomaterials; 1998; 19(7-9):669-75. PubMed ID: 9663739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo evaluation of a new composite mesh (10% polypropylene/90% poly-L-lactic acid) for hernia repair.
Tanaka K; Mutter D; Inoue H; Lindner V; Bouras G; Forgione A; Leroy J; Aprahamian M; Marescaux J
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Jun; 18(6):991-9. PubMed ID: 17243000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Changes in abdominal wall mechanics after mesh implantation. Experimental changes in mesh stability].
Klinge U; Conze J; Klosterhalfen B; Limberg W; Obolenski B; Ottinger AP; Schumpelick V
Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1996; 381(6):323-32. PubMed ID: 9082105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional and morphologic properties of a modified mesh for inguinal hernia repair.
Junge K; Klinge U; Rosch R; Klosterhalfen B; Schumpelick V
World J Surg; 2002 Dec; 26(12):1472-80. PubMed ID: 12297937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adhesion prevention in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study comparing three lightweight porous meshes recommended for intraperitoneal use.
D'Amore L; Ceci F; Mattia S; Fabbi M; Negro P; Gossetti F
Hernia; 2017 Feb; 21(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 27757549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ALD coated polypropylene hernia meshes for prevention of mesh-related post-surgery complications: an experimental study in animals.
Abdulagatov IM; Ragimov RM; Khamidov МА; Maksumova AM; Abdullaeva NM
Biomed Mater; 2021 Nov; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 34731849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional and morphological evaluation of a low-weight, monofilament polypropylene mesh for hernia repair.
Klinge U; Junge K; Stumpf M; AP AP; Klosterhalfen B
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 11870645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevention of intestinal adhesion and regeneration of abdominal wall tissue with meshes containing an electrostatically spun acellular dermal matrix (ADM)/silk fibroin (SF) fiber composite polypropylene mesh.
Yang D; Song Z; Lin Y; Dong W; Fu S; Yang J; Zhang P; Gu Y
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Dec; 112():104087. PubMed ID: 32980670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs.
Scheidbach H; Tamme C; Tannapfel A; Lippert H; Köckerling F
Surg Endosc; 2004 Feb; 18(2):211-20. PubMed ID: 14691711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mesh implants in hernia repair. Inflammatory cell response in a rat model.
Rosch R; Junge K; Schachtrupp A; Klinge U; Klosterhalfen B; Schumpelick V
Eur Surg Res; 2003; 35(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 12740536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of adhesion formation of a new elastic thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) mesh in comparison to polypropylene (PP) meshes in IPOM position.
Lambertz A; van den Hil LCL; Schöb DS; Binnebösel M; Kroh A; Klinge U; Neumann UP; Klink CD
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jan; 53():366-372. PubMed ID: 26406584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch versus polypropylene mesh for the repair of contaminated defects of the abdominal wall.
Bleichrodt RP; Simmermacher RK; van der Lei B; Schakenraad JM
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jan; 176(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 8427001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia.
Schmidbauer S; Ladurner R; Hallfeldt KK; Mussack T
Eur J Med Res; 2005 Jun; 10(6):247-53. PubMed ID: 16033714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of polypropylene amount on functional outcome and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair by the TAPP procedure using pure, mixed, and titanium-coated meshes.
Horstmann R; Hellwig M; Classen C; Röttgermann S; Palmes D
World J Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1742-9. PubMed ID: 16902744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes.
Welty G; Klinge U; Klosterhalfen B; Kasperk R; Schumpelick V
Hernia; 2001 Sep; 5(3):142-7. PubMed ID: 11759800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
