172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9884176)
1. Out of step with the Lancet homeopathy meta-analysis: more objections than objectivity?
Dean M
J Altern Complement Med; 1998; 4(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 9884176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Is homeopathy superior to placebo? Controversy apropos of a meta-analysis of controlled studies].
Scheen A; Lefèbvre P
Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg; 1999; 154(7-9):295-304; discussion 304-7. PubMed ID: 10855337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Homeopathy again: a questionable meta-analysis.
Prescrire Int; 1998 Jun; 7(35):94-5. PubMed ID: 10342930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Homeopathy: meta-analyses of pooled clinical data.
Hahn RG
Forsch Komplementmed; 2013; 20(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 24200828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of results with homeopathic remedies.
Buckman R
CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1128-9. PubMed ID: 10234340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy.
Ernst E
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2002 Dec; 54(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 12492603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Homeopathy and its ethical use in dentistry.
Eames S; Darby P
Br Dent J; 2011 Apr; 210(7):299-301. PubMed ID: 21475273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Priorities and methods for developing the evidence profile of homeopathy. Recommendations of the ECH general assembly and XVIII Symposium of GIRI.
Van Wassenhoven M
Homeopathy; 2005 Apr; 94(2):107-24. PubMed ID: 15892493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prominent doctors and scientists reject Lancet report on homoeopathy.
Saunders B; Gower N
S Afr Med J; 2006 Apr; 96(4):260, 262; discussion 262. PubMed ID: 16670783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research on homeopathy: state of the art.
Walach H; Jonas WB; Ives J; van Wijk R; Weingärtner O
J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):813-29. PubMed ID: 16296915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Controlled clinical studies of homeopathy.
Mathie RT
Homeopathy; 2015 Oct; 104(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 26678738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Serious mistakes in meta-analysis of homeopathic research.
Vithoulkas G
J Med Life; 2017; 10(1):47-49. PubMed ID: 28255376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical trials of homeopathy and placebo: analysis of a scientific debate.
Vickers AJ
J Altern Complement Med; 2000 Feb; 6(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 10706236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A critical overview of homeopathy.
Jonas WB; Kaptchuk TJ; Linde K
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Mar; 138(5):393-9. PubMed ID: 12614092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy: a state-of-the-art review.
Linde K; Melchart D
J Altern Complement Med; 1998; 4(4):371-88. PubMed ID: 9884175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) redundant for testing the efficacy of homeopathy? A critique of RCT methodology based on entanglement theory.
Milgrom LR
J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):831-8. PubMed ID: 16296916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The puzzle of homeopathy.
Reilly D
J Altern Complement Med; 2001; 7 Suppl 1():S103-9. PubMed ID: 11822623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Homeopathic arnica: just a placebo.
Prescrire Int; 2001 Oct; 10(55):156. PubMed ID: 11824436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The conclusions on the effectiveness of homeopathy highly depend on the set of analyzed trials.
Lüdtke R; Rutten ALB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 61(12):1197-1204. PubMed ID: 18834714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of homeopathy in general practice - summarized health technology assessment.
Bornhöft G; Wolf U; von Ammon K; Righetti M; Maxion-Bergemann S; Baumgartner S; Thurneysen AE; Matthiessen PF
Forsch Komplementmed; 2006; 13 Suppl 2():19-29. PubMed ID: 16883077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
