BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9884780)

  • 1. Notching of orthodontic bonding resin to facilitate ceramic bracket debond--an ex vivo investigation.
    Larmour CJ; McCabe JF; Gordon PH
    Br J Orthod; 1998 Nov; 25(4):289-91. PubMed ID: 9884780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An ex vivo assessment of resin-modified glass ionomer bonding systems in relation to ceramic bracket debond.
    Larmour CJ; McCabe JF; Gordon PH
    J Orthod; 2000 Dec; 27(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 11099572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An ex vivo investigation into the effects of chemical solvents on the debond behaviour of ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Larmour CJ; McCabe JF; Gordon PH
    Br J Orthod; 1998 Feb; 25(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 9547973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.
    Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of shear, tensile, and torsional bond strengths of ceramic brackets.
    Merrill SW; Oesterle LJ; Hermesch CB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 8074094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs.
    Bordeaux JM; Moore RN; Bagby MD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 8198079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
    Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An ex vivo assessment of gingivally offset lower premolar brackets.
    Thind BS; Larmour CJ; Stirrups DR; Lloyd CH
    J Orthod; 2004 Mar; 31(1):34-40; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 15071150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with self-etching primer.
    Uysal T; Ustdal A; Kurt G
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Apr; 32(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 19509345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shear/peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets.
    Gaffey PG; Major PW; Glover K; Grace M; Koehler JR
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 8526294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An ex vivo investigation into the use of a plasma arc lamp when using a visible light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement in orthodontic bonding.
    Pettemerides AP; Ireland AJ; Sherriff M
    J Orthod; 2001 Sep; 28(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 11504902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of enamel bleaching on the shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Oztaş E; Bağdelen G; Kiliçoğlu H; Ulukapi H; Aydin I
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 21262931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bond strength of ceramic brackets under shear stress: an in vitro report.
    Viazis AD; Cavanaugh G; Bevis RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Sep; 98(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 2144942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an ex vivo study.
    Kearns HP; Sandham JA; Bryan Jones W; Lagerström L
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Aug; 24(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9313918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.