BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9884780)

  • 21. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of different ceramic bracket base designs.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9188961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bond strength of disinfected metal and ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Speer C; Zimny D; Hopfenmueller W; Holtgrave EA
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 16279832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets to resin-composite surfaces.
    Chunhacheevachaloke E; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1997 Oct; 15(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 9528397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of the precrack preparation with an ultrasonic instrument on the ceramic bracket removal.
    Chen YL; Chen HY; Chiang YC; Chang HH; Lin CP
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2015 Aug; 114(8):704-9. PubMed ID: 23856344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins.
    Joseph VP; Rossouw E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 2137284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Changes in shear bond strength of ceramic and stainless steel brackets with different visible light curing times and directions.
    Heravi F; Bayani S
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 20043551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with various base designs bonded to aluminous and fluorapatite ceramics.
    Kukiattrakoon B; Samruajbenjakul B
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 19797413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Movahhed HZ; Ogaard B; Syverud M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 16043469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Failure mode analysis of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel.
    Eliades T; Viazis AD; Lekka M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 8322720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An ex vivo assessment of a bonding technique using a self-etching primer.
    Larmour CJ; Stirrups DR
    J Orthod; 2003 Sep; 30(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 14530420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
    Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparisons of the effectiveness of pliers with narrow and wide blades in debonding ceramic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Fehr DE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 8456783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of a cyanoacrylate adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets: an ex-vivo study.
    Al-Munajed MK; Gordon PH; McCabe JF
    J Orthod; 2000 Sep; 27(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 11099558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Ostby AW; Bishara SE; Denehy GE; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18675201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Al-Wahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):386-9. PubMed ID: 17702799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of force location in orthodontic shear bond strength testing.
    Klocke A; Kahl-Nieke B
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 15826695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain.
    Bourke BM; Rock WP
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Dec; 26(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 10592155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
    Amditis C
    Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Shear bond strengths of a selenium containing and a conventional light cured adhesive for orthodontic bonding.
    Machicek SL; McGrory KR; English JD; Stephens CR; Ellis RK; Colville CD; Powers JM; Ontiveros JC; Akyalcin S
    Tex Dent J; 2011 Dec; 128(12):1261-7. PubMed ID: 22375444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.