These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9884780)

  • 41. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of a composite resin orthodontic adhesive.
    Bishara SE; VonWald L; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Dec; 70(6):435-41. PubMed ID: 11138647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Physical and adhesive properties of dental enamel after radiotherapy and bonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Santin GC; Palma-Dibb RG; Romano FL; de Oliveira HF; Nelson Filho P; de Queiroz AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 26232837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile loading.
    Soderquist SA; Drummond JL; Evans CA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):175.e7-175.e12. PubMed ID: 16473707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns.
    Blakey R; Mah J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20620836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel.
    Adanir N; Türkkahraman H; Yalçin Güngör A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 19073952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of using a new cyanoacrylate adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; VonWald L; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Dec; 71(6):466-9. PubMed ID: 11771785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel.
    Britton JC; McInnes P; Weinberg R; Ledoux WR; Retief DH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Oct; 98(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 2145756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of sandblasting and silica coating on the bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets.
    Toroglu MS; Yaylali S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):181e1-7. PubMed ID: 18675197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Alternatives to ceramic brackets: the tensile bond strengths of two aesthetic brackets compared ex vivo with stainless steel foil-mesh bracket bases.
    Arici S; Regan D
    Br J Orthod; 1997 May; 24(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 9218111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
    Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Shear peel bond strengths of esthetic orthodontic brackets.
    Harris AM; Joseph VP; Rossouw PE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Sep; 102(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 1510045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of using a new protective sealant on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Oonsombat C; Soliman MM; Warren J
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Mar; 75(2):243-6. PubMed ID: 15825790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A comparison of tungsten-quartz-halogen, plasma arc and light-emitting diode light sources for the polymerization of an orthodontic adhesive.
    Thind BS; Stirrups DR; Lloyd CH
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 16199410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to deciduous and permanent teeth.
    Endo T; Ozoe R; Shinkai K; Shimomura J; Katoh Y; Shimooka S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 18675200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface.
    Suma S; Anita G; Chandra Shekar BR; Kallury A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 22945715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Are nano-composites and nano-ionomers suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding?
    Uysal T; Yagci A; Uysal B; Akdogan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19401356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to teeth with orthodontic composite resin and various fissure sealants.
    Joseph VP; Rossouw PE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jul; 98(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 2194391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of the ceramic/ceramic interface.
    Zelos L; Bevis RR; Keenan KM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jul; 106(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 8017345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Bond strength of ceramic brackets with various bonding systems.
    Chaconas SJ; Caputo AA; Niu GS
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 2012320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.