These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 988481)

  • 21. The concept of peer review.
    Ellis G
    Pa Nurse; 1975 Jan; 30(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 830075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Peer group review, an educational experience.
    Skipper JK; Mulligan JL; Garg ML; McNamara MJ
    Ohio State Med J; 1974 Aug; 70(8):488-90. PubMed ID: 4858610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Peer review: still tilting at windmills.
    Schorr B
    Physicians Manage; 1987 Oct; 27(10):124-6, 128, 133. PubMed ID: 10302231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. From PSROs to PROs: regs are the next major step for the new peer review law.
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1982; 15(6):10-32. PubMed ID: 10273309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Outgoing PSRO head sees solid future for peer review.
    Berstein MJ
    Hospitals; 1978 Dec; 52(23):103-5. PubMed ID: 359449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Establishing Professional Standards Review Organizations.
    Blackburn GL
    N Engl J Med; 1973 Jul; 289(1):48. PubMed ID: 4736177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Letter: Peer review or federal peering?
    N Engl J Med; 1973 Nov; 289(19):1045-6. PubMed ID: 4795415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Editorial: PSRO in your future.
    Tillis BP
    N Y State Dent J; 1973 Dec; 39(10):592-3. PubMed ID: 4518574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Professional review of health care services.
    Reynolds MM
    Health Soc Work; 1976 Nov; 1(4):38-60. PubMed ID: 791772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Peer reviewers are ready to sell your track record.
    Owens A
    Med Econ; 1984 Jun; 61(12):39-40, 44, 49. PubMed ID: 10273524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The evolving role of the American College of Surgeons in peer review and the PSRO legislation.
    Dunlop GR
    R I Med J; 1973 Aug; 56(8):329-32. PubMed ID: 4516956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Putting "peer" into PRO.
    Carroll RP
    Tex Med; 1989 Jun; 85(6):69-72. PubMed ID: 2660318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hospitals coping with the shadow of peer review.
    Tokarski C
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Dec; 19(52):22-4, 30, 33-5. PubMed ID: 10296739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peer review: is it working?
    Investor Owned Hosp Rev; 1976 Feb; 9(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 10273142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Editorial: Peer review: how to live with it.
    Hickok RJ
    Phys Ther; 1974 Jul; 54(7):705-6. PubMed ID: 4473005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Outdate--update. Continuing: who, what, where, when, how. The impact of peer review.
    Ellis GL
    NLN Publ; 1975; (52-1579):17-21. PubMed ID: 1040848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating the quality of medical care.
    Williamson JW
    N Engl J Med; 1973 Jun; 288(25):1352-3. PubMed ID: 4735895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Peer review.
    Ramphal M
    Am J Nurs; 1974 Jan; 74(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 4491941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Letter: PSRO as educational process.
    Anderson L
    N Engl J Med; 1974 Jun; 290(23):1322-3. PubMed ID: 4857133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The changing focus of peer review under Medicare.
    Mellette PM
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1986 Dec; 8(10):7-48. PubMed ID: 10301158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.