These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9884923)

  • 1. Spontaneous breakage of malleable penile prosthesis.
    Lee WH; Xin ZC; Choi YD; Choi HK
    Int J Impot Res; 1998 Dec; 10(4):255-6. PubMed ID: 9884923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Late complications of spontaneous urethral erosion of a malleable penile prosthesis in a young patient.
    Ciftci H; Verit A; Savas M
    Singapore Med J; 2012 Jun; 53(6):e120-1. PubMed ID: 22711048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spontaneous Penile Tumescence by Sparing Cavernous Tissue in the Course of Malleable Penile Prosthesis Implantation.
    Zaazaa A; Mostafa T
    J Sex Med; 2019 Mar; 16(3):474-478. PubMed ID: 30773500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedures.
    Minervini A; Ralph DJ; Pryor JP
    BJU Int; 2006 Jan; 97(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 16336342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Letter to the Editor on the Original Article: Spontaneous Penile Tumescence by Sparing Cavernous Tissue in the Course of Malleable Penile Prosthesis Implantation.
    Ghattas O; Doheim MF; Burnett AL
    J Sex Med; 2020 Jul; 17(7):1405. PubMed ID: 32340918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response and Rebuttal to the Letter to the Editor Re: "Spontaneous Penile Tumescence by Sparing Cavernous Tissue in the Course of Malleable Penile Prosthesis Implantation".
    Zaazaa A; Mostafa T
    J Sex Med; 2020 Jul; 17(7):1406. PubMed ID: 32389585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gangrene of the distal penis after implantation of malleable penile prosthesis in a diabetic patient.
    Yildirim A; Basok EK; Basaran A; Tokuc R
    Adv Ther; 2008 Feb; 25(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 18309464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Evolution and Utility of the Small-Carrion Prosthesis, Its Impact, and Progression to the Modern-Day Malleable Penile Prosthesis.
    Martinez DR; Terlecki R; Brant WO
    J Sex Med; 2015 Nov; 12 Suppl 7():423-30. PubMed ID: 26565570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Isolated pump erosion of an inflatable penile prosthesis through the scrotum in a diabetic patient.
    Talib RA; Shamsodini A; Salem EA; Canguven O; Al Ansari A
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2013 Apr; 85(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 23695409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation: are malleable prostheses an appropriate treatment option in patients with erectile dysfunction caused by prior radical surgery?
    Sevinc C; Ozkaptan O; Balaban M; Yucetas U; Karadeniz T
    Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(4):477-481. PubMed ID: 27121195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experience with Tube (Promedon) malleable penile implant.
    Fathy A; Shamloul R; AbdelRahim A; Zeidan A; El-Dakhly R; Ghanem H
    Urol Int; 2007; 79(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 17940357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Penile prosthesis implantation for treatment of postpriapism erectile dysfunction.
    Durazi MH; Jalal AA
    Urol J; 2008; 5(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 18592465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term outcomes of AMS Spectra® penile prosthesis implantation and satisfaction rates.
    Akdemir F; Okulu E; Kayıgil Ö
    Int J Impot Res; 2017 Sep; 29(5):184-188. PubMed ID: 28424506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Penile prosthesis implantation in the era of medical treatment for erectile dysfunction.
    Montague DK
    Urol Clin North Am; 2011 May; 38(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 21621088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contemporary aspects of penile prosthesis implantation.
    Montague DK; Angermeier KW
    Urol Int; 2003; 70(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 12592043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Editorial Comment on "Distinguishing Failure to Cure From Complication After Penile Prosthesis Implantation".
    Trost L
    J Sex Med; 2017 May; 14(5):738-739. PubMed ID: 28499522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peyronie's disease compromises the durability and component-malfunction rates in patients implanted with an inflatable penile prosthesis.
    DiBlasio CJ; Kurta JM; Botta S; Malcolm JB; Wan JY; Derweesh IH; Aleman MA; Wake RW
    BJU Int; 2010 Sep; 106(5):691-4. PubMed ID: 20128775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution of penile prosthetic devices.
    Le B; Burnett AL
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 25763121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response and Rebuttal to Editorial Comment on "Distinguishing Failure to Cure From Complication After Penile Prosthesis Implantation".
    Pineda M; Burnett AL
    J Sex Med; 2017 May; 14(5):740. PubMed ID: 28499523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Malleable implant substitution for the management of penile prosthesis pump erosion: a pilot study.
    Köhler TS; Modder JK; Dupree JM; Bush NC; McVary KT
    J Sex Med; 2009 May; 6(5):1474-8. PubMed ID: 19453933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.