These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9885082)

  • 21. Inter-judge agreement for identifying stuttered words.
    Hulit LM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Oct; 47(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 724375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Psychophysiological responses of adults who do not stutter while listening to stuttering.
    Guntupalli VK; Kalinowski J; Nanjundeswaran C; Saltuklaroglu T; Everhart DE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 16414137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measurement of speech disfluency through magnitude estimation and interval scaling.
    McColl D; Fucci D
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Apr; 102(2):454-60. PubMed ID: 16826667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Some comments on Lohman (2008): pseudostuttering as a training method.
    Rami MK
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Aug; 109(1):119-20. PubMed ID: 19831092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Listeners' identification and discrimination of digitally manipulated sounds as prolongations.
    Kawai N; Healey EC; Carrell TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1102-10. PubMed ID: 17672657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Lidcombe Behavioral Data Language of stuttering.
    Teesson K; Packman A; Onslow M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Aug; 46(4):1009-15. PubMed ID: 12959476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors involved in the identification of stuttering severity in a foreign language.
    Cosyns M; Einarsdóttir JT; Van Borsel J
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2015; 29(12):909-21. PubMed ID: 26308390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Speech Efficiency Score (SES): A time-domain measure of speech fluency.
    Amir O; Shapira Y; Mick L; Yaruss JS
    J Fluency Disord; 2018 Dec; 58():61-69. PubMed ID: 30119862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of stuttering severity.
    Schiavetti N; Sacco PR; Metz DE; Sitler RW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Dec; 26(4):568-73. PubMed ID: 6366371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The speech naturalness of people who stutter speaking under delayed auditory feedback as perceived by different groups of listeners.
    Van Borsel J; Eeckhout H
    J Fluency Disord; 2008 Sep; 33(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18762064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Judgments of stuttered and nonstuttered intervals by recognized authorities in stuttering research.
    Cordes AK; Ingham RJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 7731217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Listener perceptions of stuttering, prolonged speech, and verbal avoidance behaviors.
    Von Tiling J
    J Commun Disord; 2011; 44(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 20947094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intrajudge and Interjudge Reliability of the Stuttering Severity Instrument-Fourth Edition.
    Davidow JH; Scott KA
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2017 Nov; 26(4):1105-1119. PubMed ID: 28841724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Magnitude-estimation scaling of speech intelligibility: effects of listeners' experience and semantic-syntactic context.
    Ellis LW; Fucci DJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):295-305. PubMed ID: 1945708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Post-treatment speech naturalness of comprehensive stuttering program clients and differences in ratings among listener groups.
    Teshima S; Langevin M; Hagler P; Kully D
    J Fluency Disord; 2010 Mar; 35(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 20412982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of time-interval judgement training on real-time measurement of stuttering.
    Cordes AK; Ingham RJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Aug; 42(4):862-79. PubMed ID: 10450907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perceptions of simulated stuttering and fluency.
    Susca M; Healey EC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Feb; 44(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 11218110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors affecting occupational advice for speakers who do and do not stutter.
    Logan KJ; O'Connor EM
    J Fluency Disord; 2012 Mar; 37(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 22325920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.