192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9885383)
41. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas and measurements of nerve fiber layer thickness using scanning laser polarimetry].
Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
Ophthalmologe; 2005 Oct; 102(10):957-67. PubMed ID: 15871023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of high-pass resolution perimetry and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Martinez GA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 1995 Feb; 119(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 7832226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry.
Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Parisi L; Zeppieri M
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 89(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 15665349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls.
Chauhan BC; House PH; McCormick TA; LeBlanc RP
Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Jan; 117(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 9930157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Use of high spatial resolution perimetry to identify scotomata not apparent with conventional perimetry in the nasal field of glaucomatous subjects.
Westcott MC; Garway-Heath DF; Fitzke FW; Kamal D; Hitchings RA
Br J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jul; 86(7):761-6. PubMed ID: 12084745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Static threshold examination of the peripheral nasal visual field in glaucoma.
Caprioli J; Spaeth GL
Arch Ophthalmol; 1985 Aug; 103(8):1150-4. PubMed ID: 3839665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Diffuse glaucomatous structural and functional damage in the hemifield without significant pattern loss.
Grewal DS; Sehi M; Greenfield DS
Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 127(11):1442-8. PubMed ID: 19901209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Peristat: a computer-based perimetry self-test for cost-effective population screening of glaucoma.
Ianchulev T; Pham P; Makarov V; Francis B; Minckler D
Curr Eye Res; 2005 Jan; 30(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15875358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Distribution of retinal sensitivity with blue on yellow perimetry in ocular hypertension].
Maeda H; Tanaka Y; Sugiura T; Nakamura M; Yamamoto M
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Feb; 102(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9513357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Multifocal visual evoked potential responses in glaucoma patients with unilateral hemifield defects.
Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Chen CS; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Hood DC
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 12834667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Correlation of pattern discrimination perimetry to the optic disc and visual field in ocular hypertensive and chronic open-angle glaucoma patients.
Stewart WC; Connor AB; Rogers GM
Int Ophthalmol; 1995; 19(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 8586492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The screening of the central visual field.
Krieglstein GK; Andrae K
Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1975; 193(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 1078956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and full threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field loss.
Aoki Y; Takahashi G; Kitahara K
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 17415692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Measurement of Friedmann Visual Field Analyzer tests in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Cox MJ; Wood IC
Optom Vis Sci; 1993 May; 70(5):421-32. PubMed ID: 8515973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Detection of early visual field loss in glaucoma using frequency-doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry.
Landers JA; Goldberg I; Graham SL
Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 121(12):1705-10. PubMed ID: 14662589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A new scoring system for comparing the results of high-pass resolution perimetry and differential light sensitivity perimetry in glaucoma patients.
Kono Y; Yamamoto T; Kitazawa Y
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1997 Oct; 75(5):537-40. PubMed ID: 9469552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Temporal visual field in glaucoma: a re-evaluation in the automated perimetry era.
Pennebaker GE; Stewart WC
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1992; 230(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 1577288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
