These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9885464)

  • 1. The costs and benefits of primary total hip replacement. How likely are new prostheses to be cost-effective?
    Briggs A; Sculpher M; Britton A; Murray D; Fitzpatrick R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1998; 14(4):743-61. PubMed ID: 9885464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of probabilistic decision models in technology assessment : the case of total hip replacement.
    Briggs A; Sculpher M; Dawson J; Fitzpatrick R; Murray D; Malchau H
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2004; 3(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 15702945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An economic model to estimate the relative costs over 20 years of different hip prostheses.
    Baxter K; Bevan G
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1999 Sep; 53(9):542-7. PubMed ID: 10562878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Cost-Effectiveness of Dual Mobility Implants for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Computer-Based Cost-Utility Model.
    Barlow BT; McLawhorn AS; Westrich GH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(9):768-777. PubMed ID: 28463921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cemented, cementless, and hybrid prostheses for total hip replacement: cost effectiveness analysis.
    Pennington M; Grieve R; Sekhon JS; Gregg P; Black N; van der Meulen JH
    BMJ; 2013 Feb; 346():f1026. PubMed ID: 23447338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of hip prostheses in primary total hip replacement: a critical review of evidence and an economic model.
    Faulkner A; Kennedy LG; Baxter K; Donovan J; Wilkinson M; Bevan G
    Health Technol Assess; 1998; 2(6):1-133. PubMed ID: 9728294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The cost analysis of cemented versus cementless total hip replacement operations on the NHS.
    Kallala R; Anderson P; Morris S; Haddad FS
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Jul; 95-B(7):874-6. PubMed ID: 23814235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate new technologies in orthopaedics. The case of alternative bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty.
    Bozic KJ; Morshed S; Silverstein MD; Rubash HE; Kahn JG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Apr; 88(4):706-14. PubMed ID: 16595459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement used in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Cummins JS; Tomek IM; Kantor SR; Furnes O; Engesaeter LB; Finlayson SR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91(3):634-41. PubMed ID: 19255224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-utility analysis of total hip arthroplasties. Technology assessment of surgical procedures by mailed questionnaires.
    Givon U; Ginsberg GM; Horoszowski H; Shemer J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1998; 14(4):735-42. PubMed ID: 9885463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty for treatment of hip disease.
    Vale L; Wyness L; McCormack K; McKenzie L; Brazzelli M; Stearns SC
    Health Technol Assess; 2002; 6(15):1-109. PubMed ID: 12137721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost Analysis of Ceramic Heads in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Carnes KJ; Odum SM; Troyer JL; Fehring TK
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Nov; 98(21):1794-1800. PubMed ID: 27807111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness model comparing dual-mobility to fixed-bearing designs for total hip replacement in France.
    Epinette JA; Lafuma A; Robert J; Doz M
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 102(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 26803224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relative cost of cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasties.
    Yates P; Serjeant S; Rushforth G; Middleton R
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 16446193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cemented cup with acetabular impaction bone grafting is more cost-effective than an uncemented cup in patients under 50 years.
    Busch VJ; Verschueren J; Adang EM; Lie SA; Havelin LI; Schreurs BW
    Hip Int; 2016; 26(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 26743037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty-Reducing Hospital Cost Through Fixed Implant Pricing.
    Collins KD; Chen KK; Ziegler JD; Schwarzkopf R; Bosco JA; Iorio R
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9S):S141-S143. PubMed ID: 28366311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximizing cost-effectiveness while minimizing complications in total hip replacement.
    Meding JB; Keating EM; Faris PM; Ritter MA
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 1998 Apr; 27(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 9586728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variability in costs associated with total hip and knee replacement implants.
    Robinson JC; Pozen A; Tseng S; Bozic KJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(18):1693-8. PubMed ID: 22878562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Handling the procurement of prostheses for total hip replacement: description of an original value based approach and application to a real-life dataset reported in the UK.
    Messori A; Trippoli S; Marinai C
    BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e018603. PubMed ID: 29259062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [An estimate of the intramural costs of the placement of a total hip prosthesis].
    Okhuijsen SY; Dhert WJ; Faro LM; Keet JG; Schrijvers AJ; Verbout AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Jun; 142(25):1450-5. PubMed ID: 9752057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.