207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9885593)
1. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC
Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of rate of contrast medium injection on hepatic enhancement at CT.
Garcia PA; Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Liang L; Reinhold C; Atri M
Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 8633144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Effect of different threshold levels and injection rates on hepatic enhancement by using bolus tracking technique in helical CT].
Erdoğan C; Savci G
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Jun; 9(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 14661491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of two injection protocols using helical and dynamic acquisitions in CT examinations of the pancreas.
Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Atri M; Garcia P; Reinhold C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 8659419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pancreas: patient body weight tailored contrast material injection protocol versus fixed dose protocol at dynamic CT.
Yanaga Y; Awai K; Nakayama Y; Nakaura T; Tamura Y; Hatemura M; Yamashita Y
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 17890356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hepatic enhancement during helical CT: a comparison of moderate rate uniphasic and biphasic contrast injection protocols.
Birnbaum BA; Jacobs JE; Yin D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 7676980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peak enhancement of the liver in children using power injection and helical CT.
Ruess L; Bulas DI; Kushner DC; Silverman PM; Fearon TC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 9490952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol.
Bree RL; Parisky YR; Bernardino ME; Costello P; Leder R; Brown PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 8079849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing.
Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Ogata I; Nishiharu T; Urata J; Takahashi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 8751695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abdominal vascular and visceral parenchymal contrast enhancement in MDCT: effects of injection duration.
Tsuge Y; Kanematsu M; Goshima S; Kondo H; Yokoyama R; Miyoshi T; Onozuka M; Moriyama N; Bae KT
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 20650587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods.
Han JK; Choi BI; Kim AY; Kim SJ
Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An optimal contrast dose indicator for the determination of hepatic enhancement in abdominal multidetector computed tomography: comparison of patient attenuation indicator with total body weight and body mass index.
Li J; Udayasankar UK; Tang X; Carew J; Toth TL; Small WC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):874-8. PubMed ID: 21084903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures.
Lu DS; Vedantham S; Krasny RM; Kadell B; Berger WL; Reber HA
Radiology; 1996 Jun; 199(3):697-701. PubMed ID: 8637990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multidetector CT of pancreas: effects of contrast material flow rate and individualized scan delay on enhancement of pancreas and tumor contrast.
Schueller G; Schima W; Schueller-Weidekamm C; Weber M; Stift A; Gnant M; Prokesch R
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):441-8. PubMed ID: 16982815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement.
Small WC; Nelson RC; Bernardino ME; Brummer LT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol.
Foley WD; Hoffmann RG; Quiroz FA; Kahn CE; Perret RS
Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):367-71. PubMed ID: 8029399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hepatic spiral CT: reduction of dose of intravenous contrast material.
Brink JA; Heiken JP; Forman HP; Sagel SS; Molina PL; Brown PC
Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 7568859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulation of aortic peak enhancement on MDCT using a contrast material flow phantom: feasibility study.
Awai K; Hatcho A; Nakayama Y; Kusunoki S; Liu D; Hatemura M; Funama Y; Denbo M; Sato N; Yamashita Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Feb; 186(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 16423942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
