207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9885593)
21. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
Heiken JP; Brink JA; McClennan BL; Sagel SS; Forman HP; DiCroce J
Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 8475268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MDCT of the pancreas: optimizing scanning delay with a bolus-tracking technique for pancreatic, peripancreatic vascular, and hepatic contrast enhancement.
Kondo H; Kanematsu M; Goshima S; Miyoshi T; Shiratori Y; Onozuka M; Moriyama N; Bae KT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):751-6. PubMed ID: 17312064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Hepatic enhancement and metastatic lesion conspicuity on CT scans: influence of intravenous glucagon and oral CT contrast material.
Warshauer DM; Wehmueller MD; Molina PL; Muller KE; DeLuca MC; Lee JK
Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):394-8. PubMed ID: 9015064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Secretin-assisted CT of the pancreas: improved pancreatic enhancement and tumour conspicuity.
O'Connell AM; Lyon SM; O'Sullivan P; Given MF; Morrin M; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 2008 Apr; 63(4):401-6. PubMed ID: 18325360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Application of pharmacokinetics to computed tomography: injection rates and schemes: mono-, bi-, or multiphasic?
Krause W
Invest Radiol; 1996 Feb; 31(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 8750444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. EFFECTS OF TWO CONTRAST INJECTION PROTOCOLS ON FELINE AORTIC AND HEPATIC ENHANCEMENT USING DYNAMIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
Makara M; Chau J; Hall E; Kloeppel H; Podadera J; Barrs V
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015; 56(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 25640846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Hepatic CT enhancement. Part II. Alterations in contrast material volume and rate of injection within the same patients.
Chambers TP; Baron RL; Lush RM
Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):518-22. PubMed ID: 7972771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT.
Kim T; Murakami T; Takahashi S; Tsuda K; Tomoda K; Narumi Y; Oi H; Nakamura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):429-32. PubMed ID: 9694469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of varying rates of low-osmolarity contrast media injection for hepatic CT: correlation with indocyanine green transit time.
Harmon BH; Berland LL; Lee JY
Radiology; 1992 Aug; 184(2):379-82. PubMed ID: 1620831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics.
Platt JF; Reige KA; Ellis JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 9888738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Contrast bolus dynamic computed tomography for the measurement of solid organ perfusion.
Blomley MJ; Coulden R; Bufkin C; Lipton MJ; Dawson P
Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S72-7; discussion S78. PubMed ID: 8282508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimizing contrast enhancement during helical CT of the liver: a comparison of two bolus tracking techniques.
Schweiger GD; Chang PJ; Brown BP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Dec; 171(6):1551-8. PubMed ID: 9843287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimal scan delay depending on contrast material injection duration in abdominal multi-phase computed tomography of pancreas and liver in normal Beagle dogs.
Choi SY; Lee I; Seo JW; Park HY; Choi HJ; Lee YW
J Vet Sci; 2016 Dec; 17(4):555-561. PubMed ID: 27297414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Contrast enhancement for whole-body screening using multidetector row helical CT: comparison between uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
Awai K; Imuta M; Utsunomiya D; Nakaura T; Shamima S; Kawanaka K; Hori S; Yamashita Y
Radiat Med; 2004; 22(5):303-9. PubMed ID: 15553010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Timing of parenchymal enhancement on dual-phase dynamic helical CT of the liver: how long does the hepatic arterial phase predominate?
Frederick MG; McElaney BL; Singer A; Park KS; Paulson EK; McGee SG; Nelson RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1305-10. PubMed ID: 8633437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pancreatic CT imaging: effects of different injection rates and doses of contrast material.
Kim T; Murakami T; Takahashi S; Okada A; Hori M; Narumi Y; Nakamura H
Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):219-25. PubMed ID: 10405745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography.
Fleischmann D; Rubin GD; Bankier AA; Hittmair K
Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):363-71. PubMed ID: 10671582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimization of scan delay for routine abdominal 64-slice CT with body weight-adapted application of contrast material.
Tschugunow A; Puesken M; Juergens KU; Beyer F; Buerke B; Seifarth H; Heindel W; Wessling J
Rofo; 2009 Jul; 181(7):683-90. PubMed ID: 19241327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Uniform vascular contrast enhancement and reduced contrast medium volume achieved by using exponentially decelerated contrast material injection method.
Bae KT; Tran HQ; Heiken JP
Radiology; 2004 Jun; 231(3):732-6. PubMed ID: 15163812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Hepatic helical CT: effect of reduction of iodine dose of intravenous contrast material on hepatic contrast enhancement.
Freeny PC; Gardner JC; vonIngersleben G; Heyano S; Nghiem HV; Winter TC
Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 7568860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
