These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9885613)

  • 1. Mammography grid performance.
    Rezentes PS; de Almeida A; Barnes GT
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9885613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A circuit modification that improves mammographic phototimer performance.
    LaFrance R; Gelskey DE; Barnes GT
    Radiology; 1988 Mar; 166(3):773-6. PubMed ID: 3340776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grid and slot scan scatter reduction in mammography: comparison by using Monte Carlo techniques.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA; Tang CM; Lane SM
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):519-27. PubMed ID: 11818623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultra-high-strip-density radiographic grids: a new antiscatter technique for mammography.
    Chan HP; Frank PH; Doi K; Iida N; Higashida Y
    Radiology; 1985 Mar; 154(3):807-15. PubMed ID: 3969487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scatter dose calculation for anti-scatter linear grids in mammography.
    Al Kafi MA; Maalej N; Naqvi AA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Oct; 67(10):1837-41. PubMed ID: 19632851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography.
    Gingold EL; Wu X; Barnes GT
    Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 7753987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of scatter and glare on image quality in contrast-enhanced breast imaging using an a-Si/CsI(TI) full-field flat panel detector.
    Carton AK; Acciavatti R; Kuo J; Maidment AD
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):920-8. PubMed ID: 19378752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and Monte Carlo analysis of antiscatter grids for mammography.
    Boone JM; Makarova OV; Zyryanov VN; Tang CM; Mancini DC; Moldovan N; Divan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Dec; 1(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 12625771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-ratio grid considerations in mobile chest radiography.
    Scott AW; Gauntt DM; Yester MV; Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3142-53. PubMed ID: 22755699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of scatter-to-primary ratio, grid performance and normalized average glandular dose in mammography by Monte Carlo simulation including interference and energy broadening effects.
    Cunha DM; Tomal A; Poletti ME
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(15):4335-59. PubMed ID: 20647608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from physical measurements.
    Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061901. PubMed ID: 24877812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physical evaluation of prototype high-performance anti-scatter grids: potential for improved digital radiographic image quality.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):N37-42. PubMed ID: 19098352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
    Chida K; Zuguchi M; Sai M; Saito H; Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Ito D; Kimoto N; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S
    Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast-to-noise ratios of different elements in digital mammography: evaluation of their potential as new contrast agents.
    Diekmann F; Sommer A; Lawaczeck R; Diekmann S; Pietsch H; Speck U; Hamm B; Bick U
    Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 17414528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Composition of mammographic phantom materials.
    Geise RA; Palchevsky A
    Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):347-50. PubMed ID: 8596830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scanning slit mammography.
    Barnes GT; Wu X; Wagner AJ
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8302215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative contrast-enhanced mammography for contrast medium kinetics studies.
    Arvanitis CD; Speller R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6041-64. PubMed ID: 19779213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Film based scatter measurement in mammography.
    McLean D; Ainley L; Blackett K
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2000 Mar; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 10921199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-contrast mammography with a moving grid: assessment of clinical utility.
    Sickles EA; Weber WN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jun; 146(6):1137-9. PubMed ID: 3518365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.