These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9885613)

  • 21. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
    Siegel MJ; Schmidt B; Bradley D; Suess C; Hildebolt C
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Design of linear anti-scatter grid geometry with optimum performance for screen-film and digital mammography systems.
    Khodajou-Chokami H; Sohrabpour M
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(15):5753-65. PubMed ID: 26159575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimization of x-ray spectra in digital mammography through Monte Carlo simulations.
    Cunha DM; Tomal A; Poletti ME
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1919-35. PubMed ID: 22421418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigation of grid performance using simple image quality tests.
    Bor D; Birgul O; Onal U; Olgar T
    J Med Phys; 2016; 41(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 27051166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Grids in mammography.
    Egan RL; McSweeney MB; Sprawls P
    Radiology; 1983 Feb; 146(2):359-62. PubMed ID: 6849083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Scatter correction in digital mammography based on image deconvolution.
    Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1295-309. PubMed ID: 20134081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of x-ray beam alignment on the performance of antiscatter grids.
    Carlin MD; Nishikawa RM; MacMahon H; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1996 Aug; 23(8):1347-50. PubMed ID: 8873031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
    Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Mammography using stationary grids. Qualitative and dosimetric considerations].
    Burke P; Fasciano F; Frigerio A; Spandonari T; Temporelli A
    Radiol Med; 1986 Sep; 72(9):660-3. PubMed ID: 3763970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimal technique factors for magnification mammography.
    Huda W; Steinbach BG; Geiser WR; Belden CJ
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Jul; 32(7):378-81. PubMed ID: 9228602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Calculation of dose and contrast for two mammographic grids.
    Dance DR; Persliden J; Carlsson GA
    Phys Med Biol; 1992 Jan; 37(1):235-48. PubMed ID: 1741427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating the use of anti-scatter grids in adult knee radiography.
    Abela N; Guilherme Couto J; Zarb F; Mizzi D
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):663-667. PubMed ID: 35623269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A phantom-based evaluation of an exposure equalization technique in mammography.
    Skiadopoulos S; Pierrakeas C; Costaridou L; Kalogeropoulou CP; Panayiotakis G
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Oct; 72(862):977-85. PubMed ID: 10673949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of anti-scatter grids for digital imaging with use of a direct-conversion flat-panel detector.
    Mizuta M; Sanada S; Akazawa H; Kasai T; Abe S; Ikeno Y; Mitou S
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2012 Jan; 5(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 21971637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance of glass fiber antiscatter devices at mammographic energies.
    Fahrig R; Mainprize JG; Robert N; Rogers A; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1994 Aug; 21(8):1277-82. PubMed ID: 7799871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On image quality metrics and the usefulness of grids in digital mammography.
    Chen H; Danielsson M; Xu C; Cederström B
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2015 Jan; 2(1):013501. PubMed ID: 26158077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The intensity of scattered radiation in mammography.
    Barnes GT; Brezovich IA
    Radiology; 1978 Jan; 126(1):243-7. PubMed ID: 619418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.