These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9886732)

  • 21. Automatic determination of cardiac output using an impedance plethysmography.
    Miyamoto Y; Tamura T; Mikami T
    Biotelem Patient Monit; 1981; 8(4):189-203. PubMed ID: 7337822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An investigation of thrust, depth and the impedance cardiogram as measures of cardiopulmonary resuscitation efficacy in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.
    Howe A; O'Hare P; Crawford P; Delafont B; McAlister O; Di Maio R; Clutton E; Adgey J; McEneaney D
    Resuscitation; 2015 Nov; 96():114-20. PubMed ID: 26234892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative assessment of shockable ECG rhythm detection algorithms in automated external defibrillators.
    Clifford AC
    Resuscitation; 1996 Oct; 32(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 8923585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of defibrillation efficacy between different impedance compensation techniques in high impedance porcine model.
    Li Y; Ristagno G; Yu T; Bisera J; Weil MH; Tang W
    Resuscitation; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1312-7. PubMed ID: 19720442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Automated external defibrillators: to what extent does the algorithm delay CPR?
    Rea TD; Shah S; Kudenchuk PJ; Copass MK; Cobb LA
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Aug; 46(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 16046942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do changes in transcardiac impedance modulation correlate with haemodynamic status?
    Weiss SM; Einstein R; Matthews RJ; Leer TW; Cincunegui JL; McCulloch R
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1992 Jun; 15(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 1642572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attenuated adult biphasic shocks for prolonged pediatric ventricular fibrillation: support for pediatric automated defibrillators.
    Berg RA
    Crit Care Med; 2004 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):S352-5. PubMed ID: 15508658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An external automatic device to detect ventricular fibrillation.
    Jack CM; Hunter EK; Pringle TH; Wilson JT; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Eur Heart J; 1986 May; 7(5):404-11. PubMed ID: 3732288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation.
    Dalzell GW; Adgey AA
    Br Heart J; 1991 Jun; 65(6):311-6. PubMed ID: 2054239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reconfirmation algorithms should be the standard of care in automated external defibrillators.
    Faddy SC
    Resuscitation; 2006 Mar; 68(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 16387407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Impedance cardiography during exercise in the evaluation of left-ventricular function].
    Horstmann E
    Z Kardiol; 1984 Jun; 73(6):374-9. PubMed ID: 6475178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Defibrillation probability and impedance change between shocks during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Walker RG; Koster RW; Sun C; Moffat G; Barger J; Dodson PP; Chapman FW
    Resuscitation; 2009 Jul; 80(7):773-7. PubMed ID: 19423211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Timing of defibrillation shocks for resuscitation of rapid ventricular tachycardia: does it make a difference?
    Turner I; Turner S; Grace AA
    Resuscitation; 2009 Feb; 80(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 19091453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retrospective evaluation of current-based impedance compensation defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Chen B; Yin C; Ristagno G; Quan W; Tan Q; Freeman G; Li Y
    Resuscitation; 2013 May; 84(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 23000364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Expanding automatic external defibrillators to include automated detection of cardiac, respiratory, and cardiorespiratory arrest.
    Pellis T; Bisera J; Tang W; Weil MH
    Crit Care Med; 2002 Apr; 30(4 Suppl):S176-8. PubMed ID: 11953646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Progressing from initial non-shockable rhythms to a shockable rhythm is associated with improved outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Olasveengen TM; Samdal M; Steen PA; Wik L; Sunde K
    Resuscitation; 2009 Jan; 80(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19081664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reducing no flow times during automated external defibrillation.
    Eilevstjønn J; Kramer-Johansen J; Eftestøl T; Stavland M; Myklebust H; Steen PA
    Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 16154679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Initial experience with a microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator.
    Dalzell GW; Cunningham SR; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Br Heart J; 1989 Jun; 61(6):502-5. PubMed ID: 2757862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prescribing an automated external defibrillator for children at increased risk of sudden arrhythmic death.
    McLeod KA; Fern E; Clements F; McGowan R
    Cardiol Young; 2017 Sep; 27(7):1271-1279. PubMed ID: 28606196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Transthoracic impedance changes as a tool to detect malpositioned tracheal tubes.
    Kramer-Johansen J; Eilevstjønn J; Olasveengen TM; Tomlinson AE; Dorph E; Steen PA
    Resuscitation; 2008 Jan; 76(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 17719166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.