These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9888134)

  • 1. [Cutting edges after automatic lamellar keratotomy].
    Wilhelm F; Giessmann T; Hanschke R; Duncker G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Nov; 213(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 9888134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cut edges and surface characteristics produced by different microkeratomes.
    Wilhelm FW; Giessmann T; Hanschke R; Duncker GI; Wilhelm LH
    J Refract Surg; 2000; 16(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 11110309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of cut quality using the Amadeus microkeratome with different settings.
    Tehrani M; Schäfer S; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2415-9. PubMed ID: 15519098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Precision of lenticular thickness in relation to full stroma corneal thickness. Experimental results with the lamellar microkeratome].
    Wilmes C; Draeger J; Kohlhaas M
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Apr; 89(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 1600323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An independent evaluation of second generation suction microkeratomes.
    Hofmann RF; Bechara SJ
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1992; 8(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 1450115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Femtosecond laser-assisted posterior lamellar keratoplasty: initial studies of surgical technique in eye bank eyes.
    Soong HK; Mian S; Abbasi O; Juhasz T
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Jan; 112(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 15629819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Scanning electron microscopic investigations of cutting edge quality in lamellar keratotomy using the Wavelight femtosecond laser (FS-200) : What influence do spot distance and an additional tunnel have?].
    Hammer T; Höche T; Heichel J
    Ophthalmologe; 2018 Jan; 115(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 28741162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of corneal lenticules produced for keratokyphosis and keratophakia.
    Hoffmann F; Schüler A; Wachtlin J
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1993 Nov; 2(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 8312822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 3 microkeratomes used for keratomileusis in situ in a swine model.
    Keuch RJ; Bleckmann H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Jan; 25(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 9888073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Intraocular pressure in sections with 2 microkeratomes in vitro].
    Sachs HG; Lohmann CP; Op de Laak JP
    Ophthalmologe; 1997 Oct; 94(10):707-9. PubMed ID: 9432237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preparation of donor lamellar tissue for deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty using a microkeratome and artificial anterior chamber system: endothelial cell loss and predictability of lamellar thickness.
    Kang PC; McEntire MW; Thompson CJ; Moshirfar M
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(5):381-5. PubMed ID: 16238036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Experimental studies of the precision of lamellar corneal sections].
    Drager J; Böhnke M; Klein L; Kohlhaas M
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1989; 86(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 2792996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Histologic evaluation of human posterior lamellar discs for femtosecond laser Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty.
    Cheng YY; Kang SJ; Grossniklaus HE; Pels E; Duimel HJ; Frederik PM; Hendrikse F; Nuijts RM
    Cornea; 2009 Jan; 28(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 19092410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Can the cutting performance of trephines still be improved?].
    Lingenfelder C; Kupferschmid S; Grabowy U; Kleinen L; Spraul CW
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Sep; 222(9):709-16. PubMed ID: 16175480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Customizing the Amadeus II microkeratome: evaluation of cut quality with various settings using electron microscopy.
    Lackerbauer CA; Grueterich M; Kojetinsky C; Ulbig M; Kollias A
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):743-7. PubMed ID: 19787592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of microkeratome parameters on the stromal bed and flap edge quality in laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Heichel J; Wilhelm F; Kunert KS; Schlueter R; Stuhltraeger U; Hammer T
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2014; 8():61-9. PubMed ID: 24368878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of corneal flap dimensions and cut quality using a manually guided microkeratome.
    Behrens A; Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Kus MM; Rummelt C; Küchle M
    J Refract Surg; 1999; 15(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 10202705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictability of microkeratome-dependent flap thickness for DSAEK.
    Thiel MA; Kaufmann C; Dedes W; Bochmann F; Becht CN; Schipper I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Apr; 226(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 19384772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo femtosecond laser-assisted posterior lamellar keratoplasty in rabbits.
    Mian SI; Soong HK; Patel SV; Ignacio T; Juhasz T
    Cornea; 2006 Dec; 25(10):1205-9. PubMed ID: 17172899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microkeratome-assisted lamellar keratoplasty for the surgical treatment of keratoconus.
    Busin M; Zambianchi L; Arffa RC
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Jun; 112(6):987-97. PubMed ID: 15885782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.