BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9888282)

  • 21. Advanced integrated technique in breast cancer thermography.
    Ng EY; Kee EC
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 17852648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The use of Western blotting as the confirmatory test for syphilis in patients with rheumatic disease.
    Murphy FT; George R; Kubota K; Fears M; Pope V; Howard RS; Dennis GJ
    J Rheumatol; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2448-53. PubMed ID: 10555908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
    Piver MS
    Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Validation of the Short Cognitive Battery (B2C). Value in screening for Alzheimer's disease and depressive disorders in psychiatric practice].
    Robert PH; Schuck S; Dubois B; Lépine JP; Gallarda T; Olié JP; Goni S; Troy S
    Encephale; 2003; 29(3 Pt 1):266-72. PubMed ID: 12876552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing observer agreement in studies involving replicated binary observations.
    Haber M; Gao J; Barnhart HX
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):757-66. PubMed ID: 17613652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Random effects models in latent class analysis for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests.
    Qu Y; Tan M; Kutner MH
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):797-810. PubMed ID: 8805757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How independent are multiple 'independent' diagnostic classifications?
    Brenner H
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(13):1377-86. PubMed ID: 8841648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic or screening test accuracy when the reference standard is imperfect.
    Walter SD; Macaskill P; Lord SJ; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(11-12):1129-38. PubMed ID: 22351623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating qualitative assays using sensitivity and specificity.
    Zhong B
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):409-24. PubMed ID: 12477066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A measure of goodness-of-fit for the lognormal model applied to occupational exposures.
    Waters MA; Selvin S; Rappaport SM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Nov; 52(11):493-502. PubMed ID: 1746412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimating screening test sensitivity and tumour progression using tumour size and time since previous screening.
    Weedon-Fekjaer H; Tretli S; Aalen OO
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2010 Oct; 19(5):507-27. PubMed ID: 20356856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the accuracy of two tests with a confirmatory procedure limited to positive results.
    Cheng H; Macaluso M
    Epidemiology; 1997 Jan; 8(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 9116081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validity and coverage of estimates of relative accuracy.
    Cheng H; Macaluso M; Hardin JM
    Ann Epidemiol; 2000 May; 10(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 10854959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Issues in combining independent estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test.
    Shapiro DE
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2 Suppl 1():S37-47; discussion S65-9, S83. PubMed ID: 9419704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analytic methods for comparing two dichotomous screening or diagnostic tests applied to two populations of differing disease prevalence when individuals negative on both tests are unverified.
    Berry G; Smith CL; Macaskill P; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2002 Mar; 21(6):853-62. PubMed ID: 11870821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the estimation of disease prevalence by latent class models for screening studies using two screening tests with categorical disease status verified in test positives only.
    Chu H; Zhou Y; Cole SR; Ibrahim JG
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(11):1206-18. PubMed ID: 20191614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnostic test analyses in search of their gold standard: latent class analyses with random effects.
    Goetghebeur E; Liinev J; Boelaert M; Van der Stuyft P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Jun; 9(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 11084706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing dichotomous screening tests when individuals negative on both tests are not verified.
    Chock C; Irwig L; Berry G; Glasziou P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Nov; 50(11):1211-7. PubMed ID: 9393377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative analysis of diagnostic procedures for tumor detection rates in paired data.
    Lim Y; Choi JS; Kim K; Park M; Kim S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1477-1488. PubMed ID: 29557258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Simplifying the estimation of diagnostic testing accuracy over time for high specificity tests in the absence of a gold standard.
    Drew C; Badio M; Dennis D; Hensley L; Higgs E; Sneller M; Fallah M; Reilly C
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1546-1558. PubMed ID: 35531799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.