These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9888764)

  • 1. Selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography of the hands and feet: a subjective comparison.
    Piraino DW; Davros WJ; Lieber M; Richmond BJ; Schils JP; Recht MP; Grooff PN; Belhobek GH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 9888764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.
    Woodard PK; Slone RM; Gierada DS; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
    Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 9122392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Selenium-based digital radiography of the cervical spine: comparison with screen-film radiography for the depiction of anatomic details].
    Ludwig K; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Link TM; Lenzen H; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2002 Aug; 174(8):1028-32. PubMed ID: 12142983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital radiography with a large-scale electronic flat-panel detector vs. screen-film radiography: observer preference in clinical skeletal diagnostics.
    Hamers S; Freyschmidt J; Neitzel U
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1753-9. PubMed ID: 11511898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.
    Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Albrich H; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9648757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of porcine bone lesions and fissures: comparing digital selenium, digital luminescence, and analog film-screen radiography.
    Zähringer M; Krug B; Kamm KF; Wassmer G; Hellmich M; Winnekendonk G; Andermahr J; Gossmann A; Lackner KJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Dec; 177(6):1397-403. PubMed ID: 11717093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
    Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
    Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
    Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M; Schmidt A; Neitzel U; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of digital radiography based on a large-area cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector compared with screen-film radiography for skeletal system and abdomen.
    Okamura T; Tanaka S; Koyama K; Norihumi N; Daikokuya H; Matsuoka T; Kishimoto K; Hatagawa M; Kudoh H; Yamada R
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Jul; 12(7):1741-7. PubMed ID: 12111065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
    van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can we see enough? A comparative study of film-screen vs digital radiographs in small lesions in rheumatoid arthritis.
    van der Jagt EJ; Hofman S; Kraft BM; van Leeuwen MA
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(2):304-7. PubMed ID: 10663761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
    Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients.
    Jablanovic D; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Damjanov N; Seric S; Radak-Perovic M; Arandjic D; Maksimovic R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 23185070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of pulmonary edema in pigs: storage phosphor versus amorphous selenium-based flat-panel-detector radiography.
    Kim TS; Im JG; Goo JM; Lee KH; Lee YJ; Kim SH; Kim S
    Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 12034937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of digital selenium radiography with an analog screen-film system in the diagnostic process of pneumoconiosis according to ILO classification].
    Zähringer M; Piekarski C; Saupe M; Braun W; Winnekendonk G; Gossmann A; Krüger K; Krug B
    Rofo; 2001 Oct; 173(10):942-8. PubMed ID: 11588684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of CT-proved pulmonary nodules: comparison of selenium-based digital and conventional screen-film chest radiographs.
    Woodard PK; Slone RM; Sagel SS; Fleishman MJ; Gutierrez FR; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
    Radiology; 1998 Dec; 209(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 9844662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.
    Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
    Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl HG; Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.