These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9888764)
21. Imaging performance with different doses in skeletal radiography: comparison of a needle-structured and a conventional storage phosphor system with a flat-panel detector. Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser MF; Körner M Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 19001150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography. Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography. Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Selenium-based digital radiography in the detection of bone lesions: preliminary experience with experimentally created defects. Ludwig K; Link TM; Fiebich M; Renger B; Diederich S; Oelerich M; Lenzen H; Heindel W Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):220-4. PubMed ID: 10887251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model. Ludwig K; Ahlers K; Wormanns D; Freund M; Bernhardt TM; Diederich S; Heindel W Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Can digital selenium-based radiography in thoracic diagnosis replace the analog x-ray imaging technic?]. Zähringer M; Krug B; Dölken W; Gossmann A; Lackner K Rofo; 1997 Jul; 167(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 9289041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Screen-film versus computed radiography imaging of the hand: a direct comparison. Swee RG; Gray JE; Beabout JW; McLeod RA; Cooper KL; Bond JR; Wenger DE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):539-42. PubMed ID: 9016243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Skeletal surveys for child abuse: comparison of interpretation using digitized images and screen-film radiographs. Youmans DC; Don S; Hildebolt C; Shackelford GD; Luker GD; McAlister WH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1415-9. PubMed ID: 9798889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique]. Krug B; Zähringer M; Lackner K Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography. Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography. Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Digital radiography: comparison of different methods for imaging of the thorax and the gastrointestinal tracts. Busch HP J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):8-10. PubMed ID: 7734546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects. Zähringer M; Reineck S; Perniok A; Krüger K; Andermahr J; Rubbert A; Winnekendonk G Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Chest imaging with a selenium detector versus conventional film radiography: a CT-controlled study. van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Vos JA; Feldberg MA Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 8756915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system. Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [The value of digital imaging techniques in skeletal imaging]. Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Sommer A; Georgi M Rofo; 1991 Mar; 154(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 1849297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Digital luminescence radiography in comparison with the conventional film-screen technique in diagnosis of fractures]. Fink U; Schwerdtfeger J; Fink BK; Schätzl M; Reiser M Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 8645859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography. Ludwig K; Henschel A; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Wormanns D; Diederich S; Heindel W Eur Radiol; 2003 Jun; 13(6):1316-23. PubMed ID: 12764648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Digital selenium radiography: a comparison of the picture quality of thoracic images in normal and reduced image formats based on the structural anatomical details]. Zähringer M; Krug B; Kamm KF; Jung G; Dölken W; Wassmer G; Lackner K Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9711280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems. Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Hochbergs P; Lindberg CG; Medin J; Nordström AJ; Sanfridsson J; Vojciechowski J Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):332-6. PubMed ID: 8845264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]