222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9890598)
1. Research guidelines issued for persons with mental disorders and impaired capacity to make decisions.
Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jan; 50(1):128-9. PubMed ID: 9890598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An introduction to NBAC's report on research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity.
Childress JF
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):101-15. PubMed ID: 11658169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Are research ethics bad for our mental health?
Michels R
N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1427-30. PubMed ID: 10228197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Competence and consent to research: a critique of the recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
Appelbaum PS
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):265-76. PubMed ID: 11658181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. IRBs: protecting the well-being of subject-participants with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity.
Baylis F
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):183-99. PubMed ID: 11658175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical and human-rights issues in research on mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity.
Capron AM
N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1430-4. PubMed ID: 10228198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. American guidance for institutional review boards.
Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Nov; No. 143():20-4. PubMed ID: 11657619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
Sundram CJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Public bioethics and research involving persons with mental disorders.
Backlar P
Community Ment Health J; 1999 Oct; 35(5):389-99. PubMed ID: 10547115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Proposed regulations for research involving those institutionalized as mentally infirm: a consideration of their relevance in 1995.
Levine RJ
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):177-86. PubMed ID: 11654513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Panel tightens rules on mental disorders.
Marshall E
Science; 1998 Nov; 282(5394):1617. PubMed ID: 9867656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The ethics of involving psychiatrically impaired persons in research.
DeRenzo EG
IRB; 1994; 16(6):7-9, 11. PubMed ID: 11659990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Planning for future research participation: ethical and practical considerations.
Dresser R
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):129-36. PubMed ID: 11658171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Institutional review boards (IRBs) and conflict of interest.
Shamoo AE
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):201-12. PubMed ID: 11658176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Research ethics. NIH examines standards for consent.
Marshall E
Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1688. PubMed ID: 9660706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal and ethical complexities of consent with cognitively impaired research subjects: proposed guidelines.
Berg JW
J Law Med Ethics; 1996; 24(1):18-35. PubMed ID: 8925010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bioethics group divided over research on mentally ill.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1998 Nov; ():A6. PubMed ID: 11648074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
