These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9890701)
1. Cost-utility model comparing docetaxel and paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer patients. Brown RE; Hutton J Anticancer Drugs; 1998 Nov; 9(10):899-907. PubMed ID: 9890701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An economic evaluation of docetaxel and paclitaxel regimens in metastatic breast cancer in the UK. Benedict A; Cameron DA; Corson H; Jones SE Pharmacoeconomics; 2009; 27(10):847-59. PubMed ID: 19803539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Docetaxel. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Lamb HM; Wiseman LR Pharmacoeconomics; 1998 Oct; 14(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 10344911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost effectiveness of treatment options in advanced breast cancer in the UK. Brown RE; Hutton J; Burrell A Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19(11):1091-102. PubMed ID: 11735676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-utility analysis of chemotherapy using paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinorelbine for patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer. Leung PP; Tannock IF; Oza AM; Puodziunas A; Dranitsaris G J Clin Oncol; 1999 Oct; 17(10):3082-90. PubMed ID: 10506603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analyses of docetaxel versus paclitaxel once weekly in patients with metastatic breast cancer in progression following anthracycline chemotherapy, in Spain. Frías C; Cortés J; Seguí MÁ; Oyagüez I; Casado MÁ Clin Transl Oncol; 2010 Oct; 12(10):692-700. PubMed ID: 20947484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A rapid and systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the taxanes used in the treatment of advanced breast and ovarian cancer. Lister-Sharp D; McDonagh MS; Khan KS; Kleijnen J Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(17):1-113. PubMed ID: 11074389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-utility analysis of taxane therapy. Yee GC Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1997 Dec; 54(24 Suppl 2):S11-5. PubMed ID: 9435927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Taxanes for the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation. Ward S; Simpson E; Davis S; Hind D; Rees A; Wilkinson A Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(40):1-144. PubMed ID: 17903394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of docetaxel versus weekly paclitaxel in adjuvant treatment of regional breast cancer in New Zealand. Webber-Foster R; Kvizhinadze G; Rivalland G; Blakely T Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Jul; 32(7):707-24. PubMed ID: 24859241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A medico-economic evaluation of second line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: comparison between docetaxel, paclitaxel, and vinorelbine]. Launois RJ; Reboul-Marty JM; Bonneterre J Bull Cancer; 1997 Jul; 84(7):709-21. PubMed ID: 9339197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paclitaxel and docetaxel. Innovation, but at what cost? Lønning PE Pharmacoeconomics; 1995 Jul; 8(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10155597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Population-based pharmacoeconomic model for adopting capecitabine/docetaxel combination treatment for anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Verma S; Ilersich AL Oncologist; 2003; 8(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 12773745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic analysis of albumin-bound paclitaxel for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Dranitsaris G; Cottrell W; Spirovski B; Hopkins S J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2009 Jun; 15(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 19036903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cost-utility analysis of second-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Docetaxel versus paclitaxel versus vinorelbine. Launois R; Reboul-Marty J; Henry B; Bonneterre J Pharmacoeconomics; 1996 Nov; 10(5):504-21. PubMed ID: 10169397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring treatment preferences and willingness to pay for docetaxel in advanced ovarian cancer. Dranitsaris G; Elia-Pacitti J; Cottrell W Pharmacoeconomics; 2004; 22(6):375-87. PubMed ID: 15099123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-utility analysis of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel versus paclitaxel in monotherapy in pretreated metastatic breast cancer in Spain. Alba E; Ciruelos E; López R; López-Vega JM; Lluch A; Martín M; Muñoz M; Sánchez-Rovira P; Seguí MÁ; Liria MR; Pérez-Alcántara F Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2013 Jun; 13(3):381-91. PubMed ID: 23534988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Paclitaxel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Young M; Plosker GL Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19(12):1227-59. PubMed ID: 11772158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-Effectiveness of Docetaxel and Paclitaxel for Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: Adaptation of a Model-Based Economic Evaluation From the United Kingdom to South Africa. Alshreef A; MacQuilkan K; Dawkins B; Riddin J; Ward S; Meads D; Taylor M; Dixon S; Culyer AJ; Ruiz F; Chalkidou K; Edoka I Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 Sep; 19():65-74. PubMed ID: 31096179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. nab-Paclitaxel weekly or every 3 weeks compared to standard docetaxel as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an economic analysis of a prospective randomized trial. Dranitsaris G; Coleman R; Gradishar W Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Feb; 119(3):717-24. PubMed ID: 19495958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]