183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9894174)
1. Gram stain method shows better sensitivity than clinical criteria for detection of bacterial vaginosis in surveillance of pregnant, low-income women in a clinical setting.
Tam MT; Yungbluth M; Myles T
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 1998; 6(5):204-8. PubMed ID: 9894174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time PCR assay versus clinical and Gram stain identification of bacterial vaginosis.
Menard JP; Mazouni C; Fenollar F; Raoult D; Boubli L; Bretelle F
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1547-52. PubMed ID: 20814710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving Gram-stained reproducible result by further adding clue cells in diagnosing bacterial vaginosis.
Lin DP; Pan BJ; Fuh JC; Huang TH
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2002 Apr; 18(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 12164009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Gram and Kopeloff stains in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy.
Libman MD; Kramer M; Platt R;
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2006 Mar; 54(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 16427240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation of Trichomonas vaginalis to bacterial vaginosis: a laboratory-based study.
El Sayed Zaki M; Raafat D; El Emshaty W; Azab MS; Goda H
J Infect Dev Ctries; 2010 Mar; 4(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 20351456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A comparison of 2 clinical laboratory methods in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis].
González-Pedraza-Avilés A; Inzunza-Montiel A; Ortiz-Zaragoza C; Ponce-Rosas R; Irigoyen-Coria A
Aten Primaria; 1997 Apr; 19(7):357-60. PubMed ID: 9254139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relation between Gram-stain and clinical criteria for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis with special reference to Gram grade II evaluation.
Taylor-Robinson D; Morgan DJ; Sheehan M; Rosenstein IJ; Lamont RF
Int J STD AIDS; 2003 Jan; 14(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 12590785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bacterial vaginosis: comparison of Pap smear and microbiological test results.
Tokyol C; Aktepe OC; Cevrioğlu AS; Altindiş M; Dilek FH
Mod Pathol; 2004 Jul; 17(7):857-60. PubMed ID: 15073605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of Amsel criteria, Nugent score, and quantitative PCR for Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis, and Lactobacillus spp. for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women.
Sha BE; Chen HY; Wang QJ; Zariffard MR; Cohen MH; Spear GT
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 43(9):4607-12. PubMed ID: 16145114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between cervical cytologic results and Gram stain as diagnostic tests for bacterial vaginosis.
Davis JD; Connor EE; Clark P; Wilkinson EJ; Duff P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):532-5. PubMed ID: 9322619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simplified gram stain interpretive method for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
Thomason JL; Anderson RJ; Gelbart SM; Osypowski PJ; Scaglione NJ; el Tabbakh G; James JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 167(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 1279973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and correlation of clinical to Gram stain diagnostic criteria in low risk pregnant women.
Gratacós E; Figueras F; Barranco M; Ros R; Andreu A; Alonso PL; Cararach V
Eur J Epidemiol; 1999 Nov; 15(10):913-6. PubMed ID: 10669125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnostic value of Gram stain for assessment of vaginal smears during pregnancy].
Wasiela M; Krzemiński Z; Hanke W; Kalinka J
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2004; 56(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 15524400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency of detection of Gardnerella vaginalis in vaginal smears in the Upper Carniola region.
Grmek Košnik I; Dermota U; Golle A
Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat; 2016 Jun; 25(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 27348455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bacterial vaginosis among a group of married Jordanian women: occurrence and laboratory diagnosis.
Abu Shaqra QM
Cytobios; 2001; 105(408):35-43. PubMed ID: 11368266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis from self-obtained vaginal swabs.
Strauss RA; Eucker B; Savitz DA; Thorp JM
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 13(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 16040325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of the vaginal gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
Schwebke JR; Hillier SL; Sobel JD; McGregor JA; Sweet RL
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):573-6. PubMed ID: 8841221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DNA hybridization test: rapid diagnostic tool for excluding bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women with symptoms suggestive of infection.
Witt A; Petricevic L; Kaufmann U; Gregor H; Kiss H
J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Aug; 40(8):3057-9. PubMed ID: 12149379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation.
Nugent RP; Krohn MA; Hillier SL
J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Feb; 29(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 1706728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostic method for bacterial vaginosis.
Obata-Yasuoka M; Ba-Thein W; Hamada H; Hayashi H
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 100(4):759-64. PubMed ID: 12383546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
