These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9894529)

  • 1. [Sensitivity differences of different emulsion numbers for different UV/blue-sensitive films].
    Blendl C; Goergens K
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Nov; 8(6):288-92. PubMed ID: 9894529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality assurance from the viewpoint of the x-ray film industry].
    von Volkmann T
    Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8):367-76. PubMed ID: 1410322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of preexposed step wedges in acceptance tests of film processing in mammography].
    Blendl C
    Radiologe; 2003 Mar; 43(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 12664240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The influence of the spectrum and the type of exposure on the contrast of double-sided coated x-ray film].
    Blendl C; Bollen R; Freytag KH
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 1457475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Speed S sensitivity of film-screen systems and mode of action of different automatic illumination in general practice. I: Film-screen systems].
    Blendl C; Kondmann M; Müller J
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 9410006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The determination of the point of time in processing archived X-ray films].
    Blendl C; Löbach W; Owert P
    Radiologe; 2003 Mar; 43(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 12664239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [An experimental study of the film parameters for general roentgenography].
    Gorelik FG
    Med Tekh; 2000; (5):32-6. PubMed ID: 11076363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quality assurance in roentgen diagnosis. Comparison of constancy test methods according to DIN and IEC and practical consequences in Germany].
    Rassow J; Kütterer G; Neitzel U; Puschert W
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 8924457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A quality control programme for medical X-ray films in India.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 21345880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Analysis of reject x-ray films as a quality assurance element in diagnostic radiology].
    Lewentat G; Bohndorf K
    Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 9198508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
    Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative physical evaluation of four X-ray films.
    Egyed M; Shearer DR
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Sep; 3(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 10253292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of different methods of control of film processing].
    Lenzen H; Fiebich M; Kötter L; Meier N
    Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8):377-83. PubMed ID: 1410323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the "STEP Test" to evaluate processing speed in Moroccan hospitals.
    Nfaoiu K; Bentayeb F; Basraoui O; Azevedo AC
    Phys Med; 2010; 26(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 19963422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetric characterization of GafChromic EBT film and its implication on film dosimetry quality assurance.
    Fuss M; Sturtewagen E; De Wagter C; Georg D
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4211-25. PubMed ID: 17664604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitometric responses of selected medical radiographic films.
    Kofler JM; Gray JE
    Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):879-83. PubMed ID: 1947114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
    Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A comparison of various methods of x-ray sensitometry].
    Maslov LA; Gurvich AM; Chikirdin EG; Il'ina MA; Popova TA
    Med Tekh; 1988; (5):36-41. PubMed ID: 3200152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Processor quality control in laser imaging systems.
    Bogucki TM; Murphy WR; Baker CW; Piazza SS; Haus AG
    Med Phys; 1997 Apr; 24(4):581-4. PubMed ID: 9127311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Quality assurance in stereotactic space. Determination of the accuracy of aim and dose in single dose radiosurgery].
    Mack A; Mack G; Weltz D; Hönes A; Jess A; Wowra B; Czempiel H; Heck B; Kreiner HJ; Seifert V; Böttcher H
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2003 Nov; 179(11):760-6. PubMed ID: 14605746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.