164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9894650)
1. Effect of a single element subcutaneous array electrode added to a transvenous electrode configuration on the defibrillation field and the defibrillation threshold.
Kühlkamp V; Dörnberger V; Khalighi K; Mewis C; Suchalla R; Ziemer G; Seipel L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Dec; 21(12):2596-605. PubMed ID: 9894650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal electrode position for transvenous defibrillation: a prospective randomized study.
Stajduhar KC; Ott GY; Kron J; McAnulty JH; Oliver RP; Reynolds BT; Adler SW; Halperin BD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 8522716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems.
Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode.
Bardy GH; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Mehra R; Johnson G
Circulation; 1994 Mar; 89(3):1090-3. PubMed ID: 8124794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of shock polarity on ventricular defibrillation threshold using a transvenous lead system.
Strickberger SA; Hummel JD; Horwood LE; Jentzer J; Daoud E; Niebauer M; Bakr O; Man KC; Williamson BD; Kou W
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Oct; 24(4):1069-72. PubMed ID: 7930199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transvenous-subcutaneous defibrillation leads: effect of transvenous electrode polarity on defibrillation threshold.
Block M; Hammel D; Böcker D; Borggrefe M; Budde T; Isbruch F; Scheld HH; Breithardt G
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Nov; 5(11):912-8. PubMed ID: 7889231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode.
Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transvenous biventricular defibrillation.
Meisel E; Butter C; Philippon F; Higgins S; Strickberger SA; Smith J; Hahn S; Michel U; Schubert B; Pfeiffer D
Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(9A):76K-85K. PubMed ID: 11084104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the efficacy of a subcutaneous array electrode with a subcutaneous patch electrode, a prospective randomized study.
Kühlkamp V; Dörnberger V; Mewis C; Seipel L
Int J Cardiol; 2001 May; 78(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 11376828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Defibrillation efficacy comparing a subcutaneous array electrode versus an "active can" implantable cardioverter defibrillator and a subcutaneous array electrode in addition to an "active can" implantable cardioverter defibrillator: results from active can versus array trials I and II.
Gradaus R; Block M; Seidl K; Brunn J; Isgro F; Hammel D; Hauer B; Breithardt G; Bocker D
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 12(8):921-7. PubMed ID: 11513444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system.
Exner D; Yee R; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Mehra R
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 8294680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biphasic waveform defibrillation using a three-electrode transvenous lead system in humans.
Marks ML; Johnson G; Hofer BO; Bardy GH
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 8186880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implantation of a subcutaneous lead array in combination with a transvenous defibrillation electrode via a single infraclavicular incision.
Kall JG; Kopp D; Lonchyna V; Blakeman B; Cadman C; O'Connor M; Kinder C; Gilkerson J; Avery R; Wilber D
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Mar; 18(3 Pt 1):482-5. PubMed ID: 7770371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Transvenous subcutaneous implantation technique of the cardioverter/defibrillator].
Block M; Hammel D; Borggrefe M; Scheld HH; Breithardt G
Herz; 1994 Oct; 19(5):259-77. PubMed ID: 8001899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of first-phase polarity of biphasic shocks on defibrillation threshold with a single transvenous lead system.
Strickberger SA; Man KC; Daoud E; Neary MP; Horwood LE; Niebauer M; Hummel JD; Morady F
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Jun; 25(7):1605-8. PubMed ID: 7759712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations.
Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU
Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Additional lead improves defibrillation efficacy with an abdominal 'hot can' electrode system.
Yamanouchi Y; Mowrey KA; Niebauer MJ; Tchou PJ; Wilkoff BL
Circulation; 1997 Dec; 96(12):4400-7. PubMed ID: 9416910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single-incision and single-element array electrode to lower the defibrillation threshold.
Kühlkamp V; Khalighi K; Dörnberger V; Ziemer G
Ann Thorac Surg; 1997 Oct; 64(4):1177-9. PubMed ID: 9354555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of a single-lead unipolar transvenous defibrillator compared with a system employing an additional coronary sinus electrode. A prospective, randomized study.
Kudenchuk PJ; Bardy GH; Dolack GL; Poole JE; Mehra R; Johnson G
Circulation; 1994 Jun; 89(6):2641-4. PubMed ID: 8205676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
