These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. [Film-screen combinations in mammography]. Friedrich M Z Lymphol; 1983 Dec; 7(2):92-103. PubMed ID: 6673399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography in medical practice. A rational approach. Moskowitz M JAMA; 1978 Oct; 240(17):1898-9. PubMed ID: 691205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Ultrasonography and mammography in breast cancer]. Zaĭtsev AN; Vesnin AG; Semiglazov VF; Chernomordikova MF; Chebykin IA Vopr Onkol; 1994; 40(1-3):87-90. PubMed ID: 7701800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mismatch in breast and detector size during screening and diagnostic mammography results in increased patient radiation dose. Wells CL; Slanetz PJ; Rosen MP Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 24331271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The risks of mammograms. Swartz HM; Reichling BA JAMA; 1977 Mar; 237(10):965-6. PubMed ID: 576249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical trial of mammography with film-screen-combinations. Part 1: Selection of a suitable film-screen system]. Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F Rontgenpraxis; 1981; 34(11):458-66. PubMed ID: 7313855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Method of obtaining high-quality mammograms with a simultaneous decrease in the radiation load]. Varshavskiĭ IuV; Ostrovskaia IM; Lipkovich VS; Strel'tsov IS Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1980; (3):58-61. PubMed ID: 7395037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The value of mammography in patients up to the age of 35]. Farrés MT; Grabenwöger F; Dock W; Metz V; Salomonowitz E Rofo; 1991 May; 154(5):560-2. PubMed ID: 1852050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical considerations in selection of dedicated mammography units. Feig SA; Galkin BM; Muir HD Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():15-8. PubMed ID: 3589129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. FDA approves system for digital mammography. White J J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Mar; 92(6):442. PubMed ID: 10716954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Automated mammary sonography and mammography: the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions]. Richter K; Hamm B; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Fobbe F; Prihoda H; Schmitt KJ; Frohberg HD; Winzer KJ; Aldinger HU; Guski H; Döinghaus K; Löhr G Rofo; 1998 Sep; 169(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 9779063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of mammographic screen-film systems. Arnold BA; Webster EW; Kalisher L Radiology; 1978 Oct; 129(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 693873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years with a high or low risk of breast cancer: socioeconomic status, parity, and age at birth of first child. Hellquist BN; Czene K; Hjälm A; Nyström L; Jonsson H Cancer; 2015 Jan; 121(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 25242087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Value of mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer]. Brünner N; Rasmussen SG Ugeskr Laeger; 1978 Nov; 140(48):2984-6. PubMed ID: 726103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The stationary grid in mammography: its clinical evaluation]. Draghi F; Ferrozzi G; Ferrozzi F; Ferranti C Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):96-102. PubMed ID: 8480057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammography in symptomatic women 50 years of age and under, and those over 50. Egeli RA; Urban JA Cancer; 1979 Mar; 43(3):878-82. PubMed ID: 427729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]