These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9915223)

  • 41. Can routine automated urinalysis reduce culture requests?
    Kayalp D; Dogan K; Ceylan G; Senes M; Yucel D
    Clin Biochem; 2013 Sep; 46(13-14):1285-9. PubMed ID: 23810583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. New screening diagnostic techniques in urinalysis.
    Delanghe J
    Acta Clin Belg; 2007; 62(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 17672179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Predicting urine culture results by dipstick testing and phase contrast microscopy.
    Smith P; Morris A; Reller LB
    Pathology; 2003 Apr; 35(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 12745465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A Food Debris-Like Component in the Urine Sediment From a Urostomy Pouch.
    Yamashita M; Hotta M; Yoshino K; Hidaka Y; Kimura T
    Lab Med; 2017 May; 48(2):178-182. PubMed ID: 28339785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Urinalysis interpretation: how to squeeze out the maximum information from a small sample.
    Reine NJ; Langston CE
    Clin Tech Small Anim Pract; 2005 Feb; 20(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 15822525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Optimal criteria for microscopic review of urinalysis following use of automated urine analyzer.
    Khejonnit V; Pratumvinit B; Reesukumal K; Meepanya S; Pattanavin C; Wongkrajang P
    Clin Chim Acta; 2015 Jan; 439():1-4. PubMed ID: 25280641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of urine analysis using manual and sedimentation methods.
    Kurup R; Leich M
    West Indian Med J; 2012 Jun; 61(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 23155980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accuracy of urine dipstick to predict urinary tract infections in an emergency department.
    Rehmani R
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2004; 16(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 15125171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Evaluation of the performances of the iQ(®)200 ELITE automated urine microscopy analyser and comparison with manual microscopy method].
    Dewulf G; Harrois D; Mazars E; Cattoen C; Canis F
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 2011 Oct; 59(5):264-8. PubMed ID: 19942378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An Italian external quality assessment (EQA) program on urinary sediment.
    Fogazzi GB; Secchiero S; Consonni D; Sciacovelli L; Zardo L; Garigali G; Verdesca S; Messa P; Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2010 Jun; 411(11-12):859-67. PubMed ID: 20214893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Enhancing the Detection of Dysmorphic Red Blood Cells and Renal Tubular Epithelial Cells with a Modified Urinalysis Protocol.
    Chu-Su Y; Shukuya K; Yokoyama T; Lin WC; Chiang CK; Lin CW
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():40521. PubMed ID: 28074941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of test characteristics of urine dipstick and urinalysis at various test cutoff points.
    Lammers RL; Gibson S; Kovacs D; Sears W; Strachan G
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Nov; 38(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 11679861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Analytic performance of bacteriuria and leukocyturia obtained by UriSed in culture positive urinary tract infections.
    Karakukcu C; Kayman T; Ozturk A; Torun YA
    Clin Lab; 2012; 58(1-2):107-11. PubMed ID: 22372352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Urinalysis and urinary tract infection: update for clinicians.
    Young JL; Soper DE
    Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 2001; 9(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 11916184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Improved contrast microscopy: modification of bright field for urine sediment visualisation.
    Chandrashekar V
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2018 Mar; 5(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 29565789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of LabUMat-with-UriSed and iQ200 fully automatic urine sediment analysers with manual urine analysis.
    Akin OK; Serdar MA; Cizmeci Z; Genc O; Aydin S
    Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2009 Jun; 53(Pt 2):139-44. PubMed ID: 19021504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The Italian External Quality Assessment (EQA) program on urinary sediment by microscopy examination: a 20 years journey.
    Secchiero S; Fogazzi GB; Manoni F; Epifani M; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2021 Apr; 59(5):845-856. PubMed ID: 33554535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Development of microscopic review criteria by comparison urine flow cytometer, strip and manual microscopic examination.
    Xiang D; Cong Y; Wang C; Yue J; Ma X; Lu Y; Liu P; Ma J
    Clin Lab; 2012; 58(9-10):979-85. PubMed ID: 23163114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Significance of the studies of urinary syndrome in clinical practice].
    Diadyk AI; Siniachenko OV; Khomenko MV; Bagriĭ AE; Shchukina EV; Tsyba IN
    Klin Med (Mosk); 1991 Dec; 69(12):21-4. PubMed ID: 1787669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Errors in the medical report of urine cellular fraction].
    Sancipriano GP
    G Ital Nefrol; 2018 Feb; 35(1):. PubMed ID: 29390246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.