BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9915966)

  • 1. Relatedness coefficients and their applications for triplets and quartets of genetic markers.
    Ritland K
    G3 (Bethesda); 2024 Apr; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 38411620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parkinson's disease induced pluripotent stem cells with triplication of the α-synuclein locus.
    Devine MJ; Ryten M; Vodicka P; Thomson AJ; Burdon T; Houlden H; Cavaleri F; Nagano M; Drummond NJ; Taanman JW; Schapira AH; Gwinn K; Hardy J; Lewis PA; Kunath T
    Nat Commun; 2011 Aug; 2():440. PubMed ID: 21863007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EM-random forest and new measures of variable importance for multi-locus quantitative trait linkage analysis.
    Lee SS; Sun L; Kustra R; Bull SB
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 24(14):1603-10. PubMed ID: 18499695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theoretical and empirical power of regression and maximum-likelihood methods to map quantitative trait loci in general pedigrees.
    Yu X; Knott SA; Visscher PM
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Jul; 75(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 15152343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of genome screens for two independent cohorts provides replication of suggestive linkage of bone mineral density to 3p21 and 1p36.
    Wilson SG; Reed PW; Bansal A; Chiano M; Lindersson M; Langdown M; Prince RL; Thompson D; Thompson E; Bailey M; Kleyn PW; Sambrook P; Shi MM; Spector TD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Jan; 72(1):144-55. PubMed ID: 12478480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Powerful regression-based quantitative-trait linkage analysis of general pedigrees.
    Sham PC; Purcell S; Cherny SS; Abecasis GR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Aug; 71(2):238-53. PubMed ID: 12111667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias in estimates of quantitative-trait-locus effect in genome scans: demonstration of the phenomenon and a method-of-moments procedure for reducing bias.
    Allison DB; Fernandez JR; Heo M; Zhu S; Etzel C; Beasley TM; Amos CI
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Mar; 70(3):575-85. PubMed ID: 11836648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A score-statistic approach for the mapping of quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size.
    Wang K; Huang J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):412-24. PubMed ID: 11791211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for linkage of stature to chromosome 3p26 in a large U.K. Family data set ascertained for type 2 diabetes.
    Wiltshire S; Frayling TM; Hattersley AT; Hitman GA; Walker M; Levy JC; O'Rahilly S; Groves CJ; Menzel S; Cardon LR; McCarthy MI
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):543-6. PubMed ID: 11753821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonpaternity in linkage studies of extremely discordant sib pairs.
    Neale MC; Neale BM; Sullivan PF
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):526-9. PubMed ID: 11745068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal haplotype structure for linkage disequilibrium-based fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using identity by descent.
    Grapes L; Firat MZ; Dekkers JC; Rothschild MF; Fernando RL
    Genetics; 2006 Mar; 172(3):1955-65. PubMed ID: 16322505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fine-mapping of quantitative trait loci in half-sib families using current recombinations.
    Thaller G; Hoeschele I
    Genet Res; 2000 Aug; 76(1):87-104. PubMed ID: 11006637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
    Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simulation study of the effects of assignment of prior identity-by-descent probabilities to unselected sib pairs, in covariance-structure modeling of a quantitative-trait locus.
    Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; Neale MC
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Jan; 64(1):268-80. PubMed ID: 9915966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selection and subsequent analysis of sib pair data for QTL detection.
    Chatziplis DG; Hamann H; Haley CS
    Genet Res; 2001 Oct; 78(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 11732095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal selection of sib pairs from random samples for linkage analysis of a QTL using the EDAC test.
    Dolan CV; Boomsma DI
    Behav Genet; 1998 May; 28(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 9670595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.