247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9916591)
1. Comparison of coagulation modalities in surgery.
Lantis JC II; Durville FM; Connolly R; Schwaitzberg SD
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 1998 Dec; 8(6):381-94. PubMed ID: 9916591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized comparison of a new flexible bipolar hemostasis forceps designed principally for NOTES versus a conventional surgical laparoscopic bipolar forceps for intra-abdominal vessel sealing in a porcine model.
Park PO; Long GL; Bergström M; Cunningham C; Vakharia OJ; Bakos GJ; Bally KR; Rothstein RI; Swain CP
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Apr; 71(4):835-41. PubMed ID: 19942215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New application of bipolar coagulation in laparoscopic surgery.
McKernan JB; Stuto A; Champion JK
Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1996 Oct; 6(5):335-40. PubMed ID: 8890416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Hemostasis and technology. Energy. Development of new technologies].
Balagué C
Cir Esp; 2009 Jun; 85 Suppl 1():15-22. PubMed ID: 19589405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries.
Harold KL; Pollinger H; Matthews BD; Kercher KW; Sing RF; Heniford BT
Surg Endosc; 2003 Aug; 17(8):1228-30. PubMed ID: 12799888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lateral temperature spread of monopolar, bipolar and ultrasonic instruments for robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
Hefermehl LJ; Largo RA; Hermanns T; Poyet C; Sulser T; Eberli D
BJU Int; 2014 Aug; 114(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 24127773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of monopolar electrocoagulation, bipolar electrocoagulation, Ultracision, and Ligasure.
Diamantis T; Kontos M; Arvelakis A; Syroukis S; Koronarchis D; Papalois A; Agapitos E; Bastounis E; Lazaris AC
Surg Today; 2006; 36(10):908-13. PubMed ID: 16998685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery using a newly designed multifunctional bipolar cutting and monopolar coagulating instrument.
Kanehira E; Raestrup H; Schurr MO; Wehrmann M; Manncke K; Buess GF
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1993 Apr; 1(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 8055297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Results of electron microscopy studies of the uterine horn of the New Zealand rabbit following use of 4 different coagulation methods].
Riedel HH; Stamer U; Mecke H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1987; 109(22):1350-67. PubMed ID: 3434010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of steel scalpel, ultrasonic scalpel, CO2 laser, and monopolar and bipolar electrosurgery on wound healing in guinea pig oral mucosa.
Sinha UK; Gallagher LA
Laryngoscope; 2003 Feb; 113(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 12567074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic splenectomy with a vessel sealing device.
Aydin C; Kayaalp C; Olmez A; Tatli F; Kirimlioglu V
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2008; 17(5):308-12. PubMed ID: 18855205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bipolar electrosurgery: convention and innovation.
Brill AI
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 51(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 18303509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Novel hemostatic devices in thyroid surgery: electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system and harmonic scalpel.
Manouras A; Markogiannakis HE; Kekis PB; Lagoudianakis EE; Fleming B
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2008 Jul; 5(4):447-66. PubMed ID: 18573045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical utility of a novel ultrasonic vessel sealing device in transecting and sealing large vessels during laparoscopic hysterectomy using advanced hemostasis mode.
Nieboer TE; Steller CJ; Hinoul P; Maxson AJ; Schwiers ML; Miller CE; Coppus SF; Kent AS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():135-9. PubMed ID: 27124666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety and efficacy of an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device in sealing and division of the inferior mesenteric vessels in minimally invasive colorectal surgery.
Pai A; Sugrue J; Bibi S; Melich G; Marecik S; Prasad LM; Park J
Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Jul; 20(7):505-6. PubMed ID: 27170282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of effects of bipolar and monopolar electrocoagulation in brain.
Chehrazi B; Collins WF
J Neurosurg; 1981 Feb; 54(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 7452334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Greater surgical precision of a flexible carbon dioxide laser fiber compared to monopolar electrosurgery in porcine myometrium.
Bailey AP; Lancerotto L; Gridley C; Orgill DP; Nguyen H; Pescarini E; Lago G; Gargiulo AR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1103-9. PubMed ID: 24858988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of safety and efficacy of ultrasonic and bipolar thermal energy: an experimental study.
Diamantis T; Gialikaris S; Kontos M; Gakiopoulou C; Felekouras E; Papalois A; Agrogiannis G; Patsouris E; Bastounis E
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2008 Aug; 18(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 18716539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using ultrasonically activated coagulating shears.
Tsimoyiannis EC; Jabarin M; Glantzounis G; Lekkas ET; Siakas P; Stefanaki-Nikou S
Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1998 Dec; 8(6):421-4. PubMed ID: 9864107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the ultrasonic scalpel to CO2 laser and electrosurgery in terms of tissue injury and adhesion formation in a rabbit model.
Schemmel M; Haefner HK; Selvaggi SM; Warren JS; Termin CS; Hurd WW
Fertil Steril; 1997 Feb; 67(2):382-6. PubMed ID: 9022618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
