209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9917590)
1. Effects of design changes on cemented tapered femoral stem fixation.
Middleton RG; Howie DW; Costi K; Sharpe P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):47-56. PubMed ID: 9917590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polished Cemented Femoral Stems Have a Lower Rate of Revision Than Matt Finished Cemented Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 96,315 Cemented Femoral Stems.
Hoskins W; van Bavel D; Lorimer M; de Steiger RN
J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1472-1476. PubMed ID: 29310918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiographic and histologic analysis of cemented double tapered femoral stems.
Brumby SA; Howie DW; Pearcy MJ; Wang AW; Nawana NS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):229-37. PubMed ID: 9917608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Loosening rates and bone lysis with rough finished and polished stems.
Collis DK; Mohler CG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):113-22. PubMed ID: 9917596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
Behairy YM; Harris WH
Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimum 10-year survival of Kerboull cemented stems according to surface finish.
Hamadouche M; Baqué F; Lefevre N; Kerboull M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Feb; 466(2):332-9. PubMed ID: 18196414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A rough surface finish adversely affects the survivorship of a cemented femoral stem.
Della Valle AG; Zoppi A; Peterson MG; Salvati EA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Jul; (436):158-63. PubMed ID: 15995435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exeter total hip arthroplasty with matte or polished stems.
Smailys A; Tarasevicius S; Kesteris U; Kalesinskas RJ; Wingstrand H
Medicina (Kaunas); 2007; 43(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 17413250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems.
Howie DW; Middleton RG; Costi K
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 Jul; 80(4):573-6. PubMed ID: 9699814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between cement fatigue damage and implant surface finish in proximal femoral prostheses.
Lennon AB; McCormack BA; Prendergast PJ
Med Eng Phys; 2003 Dec; 25(10):833-41. PubMed ID: 14630471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cemented femoral fixation: the North Atlantic divide.
Murray DW
Orthopedics; 2011 Sep; 34(9):e462-3. PubMed ID: 21902131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiographic failure patterns of polished cemented stems.
Jewett BA; Collis DK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():132-6. PubMed ID: 17312589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
Kubinec V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of proximal stem geometry and surface finish on the fixation of a double-tapered cemented femoral stem.
Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E
J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20828697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advantages in Using Cemented Polished Tapered Stems When Performing Total Hip Arthroplasty in Very Young Patients.
Costi K; Solomon LB; McGee MA; Rickman MS; Howie DW
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1227-1233. PubMed ID: 28082045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with essentially the same geometry.
Collis DK; Mohler CG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):586-92. PubMed ID: 11940619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics.
Crowninshield RD; Jennings JD; Laurent ML; Maloney WJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):90-102. PubMed ID: 9917594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
