These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9917590)

  • 41. The long-term results of the original Exeter polished cemented femoral component: a follow-up report.
    Ling RS; Charity J; Lee AJ; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):511-7. PubMed ID: 19282139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Eleven-year follow-up of second-generation metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Park MS; Chung WC; Yoon SJ; Cho HM; Kwon SH
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2010 Apr; 18(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 20427827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Results of hip revision using the Exeter stem, impacted allograft bone, and cement.
    Ornstein E; Atroshi I; Franzén H; Johnsson R; Sandquist P; Sundberg M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Aug; (389):126-33. PubMed ID: 11501800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Polished, Collarless, Tapered, Cemented Stems for Primary Hip Arthroplasty May Exhibit High Rate of Periprosthetic Fracture at Short-Term Follow-Up.
    Scott T; Salvatore A; Woo P; Lee YY; Salvati EA; Gonzalez Della Valle A
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Apr; 33(4):1120-1125. PubMed ID: 29223405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. In vivo surface wear mechanisms of femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties: the influence of wear mechanism on clinical outcome.
    Howell JR; Blunt LA; Doyle C; Hooper RM; Lee AJ; Ling RS
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Jan; 19(1):88-101. PubMed ID: 14716656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem.
    Schreurs BW; Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Buma P; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Nov; 87(11):2499-507. PubMed ID: 16264127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
    Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Collarless polished tapered stem: clinical and radiological follow-up over 5 years.
    Yates P; Gobel D; Bannister G
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Feb; 17(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 11847618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem: analysis of 1179 first-time revisions in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Cnudde PH; Kärrholm J; Rolfson O; Timperley AJ; Mohaddes M
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4 Supple B):27-32. PubMed ID: 28363891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Metallic shedding, surface finish changes, and extensive femoral osteolysis in the loose Spectron EF stem.
    González Della Valle A; Rana A; Nestor B; Bostrom M; Westrich G; Salvati EA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jan; 442():165-70. PubMed ID: 16394756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty: 705 cases from the originating centre.
    Wilson MJ; Hook S; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Dec; 98-B(12):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 27909122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and 'taper-lock' in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Norman TL; Thyagarajan G; Saligrama VC; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1325-33. PubMed ID: 11522312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Challenges in relating experimental hip implant fixation predictions to clinical observations.
    Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 21040920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Are There Long-term Benefits to Cementing the Metaphyseal Stem in Hip Resurfacing?
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Bhaurla SK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 473(10):3197-203. PubMed ID: 26100255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Primary exeter total hip arthroplasty in patients with small femurs: a minimal of 10 years follow-up.
    Chiu KH; Shen WY; Cheung KW; Tsui HF
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Apr; 20(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 15809942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Short-term aseptic loosening of the femoral component in canine total hip replacement: effects of cementing technique on cement mantle grade.
    Ota J; Cook JL; Lewis DD; Tomlinson JL; Fox DB; Cook CR; Schultz LG; Brumitt J
    Vet Surg; 2005; 34(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16212589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.
    Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2160-70. PubMed ID: 18829914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Metal debris concentrations in soft tissues adjacent to loosened femoral stems is higher in uncemented than cemented implants.
    Kmieć K; Synder M; Kozłowski P; Drobniewski M; Sibiński M
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Aug; 15():267. PubMed ID: 25098913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cemented femoral stem fixation through the anterior approach has fewer early complications than cementless fixation.
    Ennin KA; Elsharkawy KA; Dasgupta S; Emerson RH
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jul; 103-B(7 Supple B):33-37. PubMed ID: 34192902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison between triple-tapered and double-tapered cemented femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study comparing the C-Stem versus the Exeter Universal early results after 5 years of clinical experience.
    Ek ET; Choong PF
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jan; 20(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 15660066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.