These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9917592)

  • 1. Importance of a thin cement mantle. Autopsy studies of eight hips.
    Kawate K; Maloney WJ; Bragdon CR; Biggs SA; Jasty M; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):70-6. PubMed ID: 9917592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Four-angle radiographic assessment of cement mantle thickness in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Kawate K; Yajima H; Tomita Y; Sugimoto K; Ohmura T; Hiyoshi N; Takakura Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Oct; 18(7):914-9. PubMed ID: 14566749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cement microcracks in thin-mantle regions after in vitro fatigue loading.
    Mann KA; Gupta S; Race A; Miller MA; Cleary RJ; Ayers DC
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Aug; 19(5):605-12. PubMed ID: 15284982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polished vs rough femoral components in grade A and grade C-2 cement mantles.
    Duffy GP; Lozynsky AJ; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct; 21(7):1054-63. PubMed ID: 17027551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopy of the femoral canal in revision arthroplasty of the hip.A new method for improving the operative technique and analysis of implant failure.
    Köster G; Willert H; Buchhorn GH
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1999; 119(5-6):245-52. PubMed ID: 10447616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Failure of total hip arthroplasty with a precoated prosthesis. 4- to 11-year results.
    Dowd JE; Cha CW; Trakru S; Kim SY; Yang IH; Rubash HE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):123-36. PubMed ID: 9917597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The posterior approach reduces the risk of thin cement mantles with a straight femoral stem design.
    Macpherson GJ; Hank C; Schneider M; Trayner M; Elton R; Howie CR; Breusch SJ
    Acta Orthop; 2010 Jun; 81(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 20446829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pressurization and centralization enhance the quality and reproducibility of cement mantles.
    Noble PC; Collier MB; Maltry JA; Kamaric E; Tullos HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):77-89. PubMed ID: 9917593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic assessment of the cement mantle thickness of the femoral stem in total hip replacement: a case study of 112 consecutive implants.
    Isaac GH; Busch CA; Shetty V; Drabu KJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2000; 214(5):471-7. PubMed ID: 11109854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty retrievals.
    Maloney WJ; Schmalzried T; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Dec; (405):70-8. PubMed ID: 12461358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anatomic stem design reduces risk of thin cement mantles in primary hip replacement.
    Hank C; Schneider M; Achary CS; Smith L; Breusch SJ
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Jan; 130(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19513737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distal cement mantle thickness with a triangular distal centralizer inserted into the stem tip in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Kawate K; Ohmura T; Nakajima H; Takakura Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Dec; 16(8):998-1003. PubMed ID: 11740754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thin cement mantle and osteolysis with a precoated stem.
    Kawate K; Ohmura T; Hiyoshi N; Natsume Y; Teranishi T; Tamai S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Aug; (365):124-9. PubMed ID: 10627696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acetabular cement mantles and component position: are we achieving "ideal" results?
    Sandhu HS; Martin WN; Bishay M; Pozo JL
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):841-5. PubMed ID: 16950036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preclinical assessment of the long-term endurance of cemented hip stems. Part 2: in-vitro and ex-vivo fatigue damage of the cement mantle.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Savigni P; Bordini B; Viceconti M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Aug; 221(6):585-99. PubMed ID: 17937198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct evidence of "damage accumulation" in cement mantles surrounding femoral hip stems retrieved at autopsy: cement damage correlates with duration of use and BMI.
    Race A; Miller MA; Izant TH; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2011 Sep; 44(13):2345-50. PubMed ID: 21802085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suboptimal (thin) distal cement mantle thickness as a contributory factor in total hip arthroplasty femoral component failure. A retrospective radiographic analysis favoring distal stem centralization.
    Star MJ; Colwell CW; Kelman GJ; Ballock RT; Walker RH
    J Arthroplasty; 1994 Apr; 9(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 8014645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.