These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9917595)

  • 1. Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Huiskes R; Verdonschot N; Nivbrant B
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):103-12. PubMed ID: 9917595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of design changes on cemented tapered femoral stem fixation.
    Middleton RG; Howie DW; Costi K; Sharpe P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):47-56. PubMed ID: 9917590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and 'taper-lock' in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Norman TL; Thyagarajan G; Saligrama VC; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1325-33. PubMed ID: 11522312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early subsidence of shape-closed hip arthroplasty stems is associated with late revision. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 RSA studies and 56 survival studies.
    van der Voort P; Pijls BG; Nieuwenhuijse MJ; Jasper J; Fiocco M; Plevier JW; Middeldorp S; Valstar ER; Nelissen RG
    Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 25909455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of dorsal flanges on fixation of a cemented total hip replacement femoral stem.
    Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):813-20. PubMed ID: 15069149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early Subsidence Predicts Failure of a Cemented Femoral Stem With Minor Design Changes.
    Johanson PE; Antonsson M; Shareghi B; Kärrholm J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2221-9. PubMed ID: 27188836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polished Cemented Femoral Stems Have a Lower Rate of Revision Than Matt Finished Cemented Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 96,315 Cemented Femoral Stems.
    Hoskins W; van Bavel D; Lorimer M; de Steiger RN
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1472-1476. PubMed ID: 29310918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Initial stability of cemented femoral stems as a function of surface finish, collar, and stem size.
    Ebramzadeh E; Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Buhari CF; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 14711952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of prosthesis surface roughness on the failure process of cemented hip implants after stem-cement debonding.
    Verdonschot N; Tanck E; Huiskes R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Dec; 42(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 9827679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface finish mechanics explain different clinical survivorship of cemented femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty.
    Beksac B; Taveras NA; Valle AG; Salvati EA
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(6):407-22. PubMed ID: 17956208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between cement fatigue damage and implant surface finish in proximal femoral prostheses.
    Lennon AB; McCormack BA; Prendergast PJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2003 Dec; 25(10):833-41. PubMed ID: 14630471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The skeletal response to matt and polished cemented femoral stems.
    Barker DS; Wang AW; Yeo MF; Nawana NS; Brumby SA; Pearcy MJ; Howie DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Nov; 82(8):1182-8. PubMed ID: 11132284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface roughness of debonded straight-tapered stems in cemented THA reduces subsidence but not cement damage.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    Biomaterials; 1998 Oct; 19(19):1773-9. PubMed ID: 9856588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In-vitro characteristics of cemented titanium femoral stems with a smooth surface finish.
    Akiyama H; Yamamoto K; Kaneuji A; Matsumoto T; Nakamura T
    J Orthop Sci; 2013 Jan; 18(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22945910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Failure of total hip arthroplasty with a precoated prosthesis. 4- to 11-year results.
    Dowd JE; Cha CW; Trakru S; Kim SY; Yang IH; Rubash HE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):123-36. PubMed ID: 9917597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results of hip revision using the Exeter stem, impacted allograft bone, and cement.
    Ornstein E; Atroshi I; Franzén H; Johnsson R; Sandquist P; Sundberg M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Aug; (389):126-33. PubMed ID: 11501800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cement-implant interface gaps explain the poor results of CMW3 for femoral stem fixation: A cadaver study of migration, fatigue and mantle morphology.
    Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Oct; 76(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 16263615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
    Kubinec V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Partially cemented AncaDualFit hip stems do not fail in simulated active patients.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Teutonico AS; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 17070631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Challenges in relating experimental hip implant fixation predictions to clinical observations.
    Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 21040920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.