BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9917606)

  • 21. Long-term outcome and risk factors of proximal femoral fracture in uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in 2551 hips.
    Berend ME; Smith A; Meding JB; Ritter MA; Lynch T; Davis K
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):53-9. PubMed ID: 16950062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A prospective outcomes analysis of femoral component fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Iorio R; Healy WL; Presutti AH
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):662-9. PubMed ID: 18534542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them: what is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture?
    Carli AV; Negus JJ; Haddad FS
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(1 Supple A):50-59. PubMed ID: 28042119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A double-blind study of 250 cases comparing cemented with cementless total hip arthroplasty. Cost-effectiveness and its impact on health-related quality of life.
    Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB; Laupacis A; Feeny D; Wong C; Tugwell P; Leslie K; Bullas R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jan; (298):156-64. PubMed ID: 8118970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Cementless total hip arthroplasty: a review].
    Diehl P; Haenle M; Bergschmidt P; Gollwitzer H; Schauwecker J; Bader R; Mittelmeier W
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Oct; 55(5):251-64. PubMed ID: 20958235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Radiological identification of Zweymüller-type femoral stem prosthesis in revision cases.
    Affatato S; Comitini S; Fosco M; Toni A; Tigani D
    Int Orthop; 2016 Nov; 40(11):2261-2269. PubMed ID: 26923378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A randomized clinical trial comparing cemented to cementless total hip replacement in 250 osteoarthritic patients: the impact on health related quality of life and cost effectiveness.
    Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH; Laupacis A; Feeny D; Wong C; Tugwell P; Leslie K; Bullas R
    Iowa Orthop J; 1994; 14():108-14. PubMed ID: 7719764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative study of the initial stability of cementless hip prostheses.
    Schneider E; Kinast C; Eulenberger J; Wyder D; Eskilsson G; Perren SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Nov; (248):200-9. PubMed ID: 2805480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bending stiffness, torsional stability, and insertion force of cementless femoral stems.
    Incavo SJ; Johnson CC; Churchill DL; Beynnon BD
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2001 Apr; 30(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 11334454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiographic and histologic analysis of cemented double tapered femoral stems.
    Brumby SA; Howie DW; Pearcy MJ; Wang AW; Nawana NS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):229-37. PubMed ID: 9917608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cementless hip implants: an expanding choice.
    Giebaly DE; Twaij H; Ibrahim M; Haddad FS
    Hip Int; 2016 Sep; 26(5):413-423. PubMed ID: 27689504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cost comparison of cementless versus cemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.
    Tripuraneni KR; Carothers JT; Junick DW; Archibeck MJ
    Orthopedics; 2012 Oct; 35(10):e1461-4. PubMed ID: 23027480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Design of the femoral component for cementless hip replacement: the surgeon's perspective.
    Kelsey D; Goodman SB
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 1997 Jun; 26(6):407-12. PubMed ID: 9193693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty.
    Khanuja HS; Vakil JJ; Goddard MS; Mont MA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 93(5):500-9. PubMed ID: 21368083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cementless femoral prostheses cost more to implant than cemented femoral prostheses.
    Unnanuntana A; Dimitroulias A; Bolognesi MP; Hwang KL; Goodman SB; Marcus RE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 467(6):1546-51. PubMed ID: 18781368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cemented femoral fixation: the North Atlantic divide.
    Murray DW
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11 Suppl A):51-2. PubMed ID: 24187352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Loosening of cemented total hip prostheses. 31 cases].
    Ameziane L; Berrada MS; Bensouda B; Kabbaj N; el Yaacoubi M; el Manouar M
    Ann Chir; 1998; 52(5):480. PubMed ID: 9752494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Aseptic stem loosening in primary THA: migration analysis of cemented and cementless fixation.
    Kroell A; Beaulé P; Krismer M; Behensky H; Stoeckl B; Biedermann R
    Int Orthop; 2009 Dec; 33(6):1501-5. PubMed ID: 19066889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty.
    Khanuja HS; Banerjee S; Jain D; Pivec R; Mont MA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Oct; 96(20):1742-52. PubMed ID: 25320202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 2-Year Radiostereometric Analysis Evaluation of a Short, Proximally Coated, Triple-Taper Blade Femoral Stem Versus a Quadrangular-Taper Stem With Reinforced Proximal Body: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Fontalis A; Kayani B; Vanhegan I; Tahmassebi J; Haddad IC; Giebaly DE; Rajput V; Hansjee S; Haddad FS
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S152-S161. PubMed ID: 36931355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.