BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9918314)

  • 1. A staging system for multiple myeloma based on the morphology of myeloma cells.
    Murakami H; Kawada T; Saitoh T; Uchiumi H; Moridaira K; Matsushima T; Tsukamoto N; Tamura J; Morita K; Sawamura M; Karasawa M; Miyawaki S; Shinonome S; Shimano S; Sato S; Ogawara H; Tsuchiya J
    Eur J Haematol; 1999 Jan; 62(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 9918314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple myeloma staging based on the combination of beta-2-microglobulin and albumin: the role of albumin in the model.
    Mihou D; Katodritou E; Zervas K
    Hematology; 2007 Dec; 12(6):527-31. PubMed ID: 17852450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic factors and staging systems of multiple myeloma:
    Tao ZF; Fu WJ; Yuan ZG; Wang DX; Chen YB; Hou J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct; 120(19):1655-8. PubMed ID: 17935664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Plasmablastic morphology is an independent predictor of poor survival after autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.
    Rajkumar SV; Fonseca R; Lacy MQ; Witzig TE; Therneau TM; Kyle RA; Litzow MR; Gertz MA; Greipp PR
    J Clin Oncol; 1999 May; 17(5):1551-7. PubMed ID: 10334543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abnormal cytogenetics predict poor survival after high-dose therapy and autologous blood cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.
    Rajkumar S; Fonseca R; Lacy M; Witzig T; Lust J; Greipp P; Therneau T; Kyle R; Litzow M; Gertz M
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Sep; 24(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 10482933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification and prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma. A retrospective study of relationship of survivals and responses to chemotherapy to immunological types, 20 single prognostic factors, 15 clinical staging systems, and 6 morphological classifications.
    Pasqualetti P; Colantonio D; Collacciani A; Casale R; Natali G
    Panminerva Med; 1991; 33(2):93-110. PubMed ID: 1923560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining information regarding chromosomal aberrations t(4;14) and del(17p13) with the International Staging System classification allows stratification of myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.
    Neben K; Jauch A; Bertsch U; Heiss C; Hielscher T; Seckinger A; Mors T; Müller NZ; Hillengass J; Raab MS; Ho AD; Hose D; Goldschmidt H
    Haematologica; 2010 Jul; 95(7):1150-7. PubMed ID: 20220069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporation of the bone marker carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type-1 collagen improves prognostic information of the International Staging System in newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma.
    Jakob C; Sterz J; Liebisch P; Mieth M; Rademacher J; Goerke A; Heider U; Fleissner C; Kaiser M; von Metzler I; Müller C; Sezer O
    Leukemia; 2008 Sep; 22(9):1767-72. PubMed ID: 18580957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma: a new staging system based on clinical and morphological features.
    Pasqualetti P; Casale R; Collacciani A; Colantonio D
    Eur J Cancer; 1991; 27(9):1123-6. PubMed ID: 1835621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. International prognostic index (IPI)--a critical comparison with five multiple myeloma staging systems in the group of 270 patients treated by conventional chemotherapy.
    Scudla V; Zemanova M; Minarik J; Bacovsky J; Ordeltova M; Indrak K; Budikova M; Dusek L; Farbiakova V
    Neoplasma; 2006; 53(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 16830053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. International staging system for multiple myeloma.
    Greipp PR; San Miguel J; Durie BG; Crowley JJ; Barlogie B; Bladé J; Boccadoro M; Child JA; Avet-Loiseau H; Kyle RA; Lahuerta JJ; Ludwig H; Morgan G; Powles R; Shimizu K; Shustik C; Sonneveld P; Tosi P; Turesson I; Westin J
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 23(15):3412-20. PubMed ID: 15809451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new staging system for multiple myeloma patients based on the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) experience.
    Jacobson JL; Hussein MA; Barlogie B; Durie BG; Crowley JJ;
    Br J Haematol; 2003 Aug; 122(3):441-50. PubMed ID: 12877671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Prognostic analysis and assessment on the clinical staging systems of multiple myeloma--a report of 206 cases].
    Tao ZF; Fu WJ; Chen YB; Yuan ZG; Wang DX; Hou J
    Ai Zheng; 2006 Apr; 25(4):461-4. PubMed ID: 16613681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Further stratification of patients with multiple myeloma by International Staging System in combination with ratio of serum free κ to λ light chains.
    Xu Y; Sui W; Deng S; An G; Wang Y; Xie Z; Yao H; Zhu G; Zou D; Qi J; Hao M; Zhao Y; Wang J; Chen T; Qiu L
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2013 Jan; 54(1):123-32. PubMed ID: 22712834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adverse prognostic impact of bone marrow microvessel density in multiple myeloma.
    Lee N; Lee H; Moon SY; Sohn JY; Hwang SM; Yoon OJ; Youn HS; Eom HS; Kong SY
    Ann Lab Med; 2015 Nov; 35(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 26354343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma: selection using Cox's proportional hazard model.
    Pasqualetti P; Collacciani A; Maccarone C; Casale R
    Biomed Pharmacother; 1996; 50(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 8672729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.
    Cherng NC; Asal NR; Kuebler JP; Lee ET; Solanki D
    Cancer; 1991 Jun; 67(12):3150-6. PubMed ID: 2044058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic significance of plasma cell morphology in multiple myeloma.
    Carter A; Hocherman I; Linn S; Cohen Y; Tatarsky I
    Cancer; 1987 Sep; 60(5):1060-5. PubMed ID: 3607725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Staging systems and prognostic factors as a guide to therapeutic decisions in multiple myeloma.
    Kyrtsonis MC; Maltezas D; Tzenou T; Koulieris E; Bradwell AR
    Semin Hematol; 2009 Apr; 46(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 19389494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Analysis of the international staging system of multiple myeloma and its comparison with the DS and IFM staging system in 122 Chinese patients].
    Deng SH; Xu Y; Mai YJ; Wang YF; Zhao YZ; Zou DH; Qiu LG
    Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 29(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18843972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.