These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9919025)

  • 1. How do we define longevity?
    Maggio JJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Jan; 130(1):20, 22, 24. PubMed ID: 9919025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low-quality evidence suggests that amalgam has increased longevity compared with resin-based composite in posterior restorations.
    Wong YJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Nov; 147(11):905-906. PubMed ID: 27793299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defective restorations.
    Kuban DS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Sep; 140(9):1076, 1079; author reply 1079. PubMed ID: 19723932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longevity of 2- and 3-surface restorations in posterior teeth of 25- to 30-year-olds attending Public Dental Service-A 13-year observation.
    Palotie U; Eronen AK; Vehkalahti K; Vehkalahti MM
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():13-17. PubMed ID: 28529175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
    J Dent Res; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1063-7. PubMed ID: 20660797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.
    Bernardo M; Luis H; Martin MD; Leroux BG; Rue T; Leitão J; DeRouen TA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):775-83. PubMed ID: 17545266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survey of amalgam and composite restorations in Korea.
    Mjör IA; Um CM
    Int Dent J; 1993 Aug; 43(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 8276514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age of failed restorations: A deceptive longevity parameter.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Cenci MS; Huysmans MC; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2011 Mar; 39(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 21195123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early failure of Class II resin composite versus Class II amalgam restorations placed by dental students.
    Overton JD; Sullivan DJ
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Mar; 76(3):338-40. PubMed ID: 22383602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.
    Soncini JA; Maserejian NN; Trachtenberg F; Tavares M; Hayes C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 17545265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does incomplete caries removal increase restoration failure?
    Maltz M
    J Dent Res; 2011 Apr; 90(4):541; author reply 542. PubMed ID: 21245465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.
    Hickel R; Manhart J
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Black or white revisited 2.
    Burke FJ
    Dent Update; 2012; 39(1):5. PubMed ID: 22720374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restoring the difficult class II with composite.
    Gottlieb M
    Todays FDA; 2013; 25(2):18-21. PubMed ID: 23691612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overcoming obstacles to placing posterior direct resin restorations.
    Bertolotti RL
    Dent Today; 2000 Jul; 19(7):66-71. PubMed ID: 12524821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nanomicrohybrid composites make posterior placement easier.
    Vargas M
    Dent Today; 2012 May; 31(5):128, 130-1. PubMed ID: 22650094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.